Migration and Social Remittances in a Global Europe 2016
DOI: 10.1057/978-1-137-60126-1_9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Transacting Care Transnationally: Remittances and Agency Within Global Care Chains

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Most often examined with reference to women migrant domestic workers, research in this area has interrogated gendered care norms within migrant households (Hoang & Yeoh, 2011; Locke, 2017), assessed the livelihood implications for paid and unpaid substitute care providers (Cooray, 2017; Peng & Wong, 2016), and challenged the very notion that care practices necessarily cease during transnational family separation (Ahlin & Sen, 2020; Baldassar & Merla, 2014). Indeed, scholarship on this latter theme of ‘care circulation’ has made important contributions to the way care practices are understood at a typological level, highlighting the ways in which care responsibilities continue beyond the household and across borders—whether directly providing care through the proliferation of information and communication technologies (ICTs) (Ahlin, 2018; Baldassar & Wilding, 2022), managing care needs by financing and organising substitute caregiving (Parreñas, 2000), or remitting ‘in‐kind’ care in the form of material goods (Ramsøy, 2016; Ullah et al, 2022). Yet, even more so than the global care chains literature, the relationship between migration and care is here largely de‐linked from discussion of development policy or outcomes.…”
Section: The Migration‐care‐development Nexus: An Analytical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most often examined with reference to women migrant domestic workers, research in this area has interrogated gendered care norms within migrant households (Hoang & Yeoh, 2011; Locke, 2017), assessed the livelihood implications for paid and unpaid substitute care providers (Cooray, 2017; Peng & Wong, 2016), and challenged the very notion that care practices necessarily cease during transnational family separation (Ahlin & Sen, 2020; Baldassar & Merla, 2014). Indeed, scholarship on this latter theme of ‘care circulation’ has made important contributions to the way care practices are understood at a typological level, highlighting the ways in which care responsibilities continue beyond the household and across borders—whether directly providing care through the proliferation of information and communication technologies (ICTs) (Ahlin, 2018; Baldassar & Wilding, 2022), managing care needs by financing and organising substitute caregiving (Parreñas, 2000), or remitting ‘in‐kind’ care in the form of material goods (Ramsøy, 2016; Ullah et al, 2022). Yet, even more so than the global care chains literature, the relationship between migration and care is here largely de‐linked from discussion of development policy or outcomes.…”
Section: The Migration‐care‐development Nexus: An Analytical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Carling, Bivand Erdal, & Horst, 2012; King, Castaldo, & Vullnetari, 2011). Two recent studies that use Carling's (2014) concept of script are solely based on qualitative approaches and ethnographic research (Brown, 2016; Ramsøy, 2016). We adopt the ethnosurvey as the research strategy, as described in Massey (1987).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In spite of the importance of remittance flows sent from Spain to Bolivia (see also González, Martín, Renau, & Blanco, 2012), little attention has been paid to their motivations (Roig & Recaño, 2012) and meanings. In an ethnographic study of female Bolivian domestic workers in the Basque Country (a Spanish region), Ramsøy (2016) builds on Carling's concept of script to show how care is transmitted transnationally throughout remittances.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The transnational relationships that feed into the global market of care also enter into adjacent, and often interconnecting webs of exchange. While the webs of more altruistic solidarity become practical and concrete in that they involve consumption through event organization, danc-ing, and eating/drinking, these transnational relationships are marked by more than what is most commonly described in migration theory as remittances (Carling 2014, Ramsøy 2016, Levitt 1998, Levitt & Lamba-Nieves 2011, Nowicka & Šerbedžija 2016. As such, the solidarity practiced through, for instance, kermeses, is a way of not only stabilizing someone's economic situation in migrancy, it is also a way of contributing to the future economic wellbeing of that someone's family 'at home'.…”
Section: Hoy Por Tí Mañana Por Mí: Kermeses and Solidaritymentioning
confidence: 99%