2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2004.06.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Trait anxiety impact on posterior activation asymmetries at rest and during evoked negative emotions: EEG investigation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
19
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
1
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Increased theta in OCD is a robust finding (Karadag et al, 2003;Perros, Young, Ritson, Price & Mann, 1992;Velikova et al, 2010) and the regions of activation are consistent with OCD imaging studies (Rotge et al, 2008), suggesting the activation of OCD-related circuitry. However, a more parsimonious explanation may be that this reflects greater anxiety (Aftanas & Pavlov, 2005) or more vivid imagery (Addis, Wong & Schacter et al, 2007;Weiler, Suchan & Daum, 2010).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Increased theta in OCD is a robust finding (Karadag et al, 2003;Perros, Young, Ritson, Price & Mann, 1992;Velikova et al, 2010) and the regions of activation are consistent with OCD imaging studies (Rotge et al, 2008), suggesting the activation of OCD-related circuitry. However, a more parsimonious explanation may be that this reflects greater anxiety (Aftanas & Pavlov, 2005) or more vivid imagery (Addis, Wong & Schacter et al, 2007;Weiler, Suchan & Daum, 2010).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Future studies should consider recording event-related brain responses in order to better characterize the neural bases of emotional attention biases. Additionally, while the present study focused on patterns of frontal EEG alpha asymmetry, some investigators have begun to employ whole spectrum EEG analyses to examine the multiple ways in which patterns of brain electrical activity predict individual differences in evaluative processing (Aftanas and Pavlov, 2005;Aftanas et al, 2003;Knyazev et al, 2008aKnyazev et al, ,b, 2005.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies exclusively reporting results on the genetic basis of reinforcement sensitivity or biopsychological variables (k = 15) were also excluded (e.g., Aftanas & Pavlov, 2005;Barros-Loscertales et al, 2006;Bartussek, Becker, Diedrich, Naumann, & Maier, 1996;DePascalis, Arwari, Matteucci, & Mazzocco, 2005;DePascalis & Speranza, 2000;Hemming, 1979;Martin & Potts, 2004;Reuter et al, 2004;Reuter et al, 2006). These studies either did not apply reinforcement tasks to investigate individual differences of reinforcement sensitivity or did not report results on RST-related personality differences.…”
Section: Exclusion Of Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%