Current research on female membership in mixed groups often reports mixed findings regarding female effectiveness. Some studies of malefemale leadership styles, for example, report no difference, some studies show a strong preference for male characteristics in a leader, and some studies find a complex interaction of variables when male-female styles are compared. Although norms, roles, stereotypes, and society itself appear to be in a state of flux, recent findings also imply positive suggestions for improving the quality and quantity of female interaction in mixed groups. The research implications reported here may be divided into three categories that may be used as a framework to develop management training curricula for women. By now it is well known that although women in the United States compose 43.5% of the work force they hold very few of the positions boasting high prestige and high pay (U.S. Department of Labor, 1983). The proportion of women holding administrative or managerial positions stood at 6.1~ as of 1978; however, most of the managerial positions comprising that percentage were entrylevel or slightly above (Baron, 1977; Patterson, 1975; in White, De Sanctis, & Crino, 1981). In fact, one source reports that at top executive levels as late as 1975, men outnumbered women 600 to 1 (Meyer, 1975).Although the rate at which women have moved into prestigious careers has been slower than predicted in the early years of the women's movement, there is evidence to suggest that such a transition is taking place. Between 1970 and 1978, for example, the rate at which women moved into managerial-administrative positions increased 16 times more rapidly than during the pre-