1995
DOI: 10.1108/02621719510078894
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Training women for management: changing priorities

Abstract: A number of top executive women were interviewed to determine their beliefs concerning the needs of women for management training and development. Results, which are compared with those in an earlier examination, show that socialization and skills development needs remain important, while no current concern was found for training concerning stereotyping. Communication and networking, and power and politics are seen as issues that have increased substantially in importance and that are now areas in which substa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although the importance of the people management competency for middle managers is often stressed, the specific relationship between this particular competency on the one side, and the competencies of task and self-management on the other side, is not made explicit. Given this degree of uncertainty, it was believed that the present study Earlier reference to the work of Adler (1994), Betters-Reed and Moore (1995), Blanchard (1989), Hofmeyer (1990), Larwood and Wood (1995), Lewis and Fagenson (1995), Mbigi (1994) and others further suggested that gender differences might exist in terms of managerial styles, managerial preferences and required managerial competencies. Although emphasis is placed on the importance of the interpersonal or people-related dimensions of managerial competence for females in particular, the specific relationship between this competency on the one side, and the competencies of task and self-management on the other side is again not made explicit.…”
Section: Focus Of the Studymentioning
confidence: 72%
“…Although the importance of the people management competency for middle managers is often stressed, the specific relationship between this particular competency on the one side, and the competencies of task and self-management on the other side, is not made explicit. Given this degree of uncertainty, it was believed that the present study Earlier reference to the work of Adler (1994), Betters-Reed and Moore (1995), Blanchard (1989), Hofmeyer (1990), Larwood and Wood (1995), Lewis and Fagenson (1995), Mbigi (1994) and others further suggested that gender differences might exist in terms of managerial styles, managerial preferences and required managerial competencies. Although emphasis is placed on the importance of the interpersonal or people-related dimensions of managerial competence for females in particular, the specific relationship between this competency on the one side, and the competencies of task and self-management on the other side is again not made explicit.…”
Section: Focus Of the Studymentioning
confidence: 72%
“…Social factors are the assumptions, prejudgments, and assessments against women (Baumgartner & Schneider, 2010;Boone, Veller, Nikolaeva, Keith, & Houran, 2013;Karaca, 2007). Larwood and Wood's (1995) reports based on the interviews with senior female executives shows that they still have a naive belief that having a good education, hard work, and spending enough effort will let them get ahead at higher levels. They believe that men colleagues do not concern about the company's success and are successful to use networks and policy tactics to make advance in their career.…”
Section: The Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Leadership in many organizations is still a male-dominated group, and power relationships in organizations are shaped to traditional male paradigms (Carmichael, 1995;Davidson & Ferrario, 1992;Kolb, 1997;Morrison, White, Van Velsor, & Leadership, 1992). Assumptions about characteristics that are typically associated with men and women carry over into the area of interpersonal skills so that feminine sex-linked behaviors are not regarded in a favorable light (Bem, 1994;Konrad & Cannings, 1997;Larwood & Wood, 1995;Reavley, 1989;Tannen, 1995). Male behavior patterns are more valued than feminine characteristics in the workplace (Helgesen, 1995;Hudak, 1993;Kanter, 1977;Powell, Posner, & Schmidt, 1984), creating potential barriers to the transfer of newly learned interpersonal communication skills and behavior to the workplace because trainees may see them as undesirable and ineffective.…”
Section: Effect Of Sex-typed Thinking As An Individual Difference In mentioning
confidence: 99%