2006
DOI: 10.1177/1523422306293007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Training Evaluation: Knowing More Than Is Practiced

Abstract: The problem and the solution. Training program evaluation is an important and culminating phase in the analysis, design, develop, implement, evaluate (ADDIE) process. However, evaluation has often been overlooked or not implemented to its full capacity. To assess and ensure the quality, effectiveness, and the impact of systematic training, this article emphasizes the importance of summative evaluation at the last phase of ADDIE and presents developments toward a summative evaluation framework of training progr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
86
0
7

Year Published

2009
2009
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 75 publications
(100 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
(32 reference statements)
4
86
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…In this regard, empirical examination of the efficacy of training, along with organizational training assessments, frequently rely on data that are collected from participants at the end of, or immediately after, the training course (typically though satisfaction questionnaires – often pejoratively referred to as ‘happy sheets’; Patterson & Hobley, ). However, because they have a ‘feel‐good’ function and focus on participants’ subjective evaluations of immediate, short‐term impact, it is debatable whether these can or do fully capture the extent to which training is actually transferred to the workplace (Alliger & Janak, ; Edkins, ; Kirkpatrick, ; Littrell et al ., ; Wang and Wilcox, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…In this regard, empirical examination of the efficacy of training, along with organizational training assessments, frequently rely on data that are collected from participants at the end of, or immediately after, the training course (typically though satisfaction questionnaires – often pejoratively referred to as ‘happy sheets’; Patterson & Hobley, ). However, because they have a ‘feel‐good’ function and focus on participants’ subjective evaluations of immediate, short‐term impact, it is debatable whether these can or do fully capture the extent to which training is actually transferred to the workplace (Alliger & Janak, ; Edkins, ; Kirkpatrick, ; Littrell et al ., ; Wang and Wilcox, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Wang & Spitzer, 2005), such practice in reality is often reported as difficult and problematic (Goodall et al. , 2004) because of the absence of a coherent and contextual‐based approach to evaluation (Wang & Wilcox, 2006). Wright et al.…”
Section: Analysis Of the Policy Structurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although a large amount of money is spent on training, it is estimated that only 10–20 percent from what is learned during the training is applied in the workplace (Kirwan & Birchall, 2006). For training to be beneficiary, individuals participating in this training need to take new knowledge back to the workplace and apply what they have learned (Hatala & Fleming, 2007; Wang & Wilcox, 2006). This effective and continuing application of the knowledge and skills gained by trainees to their jobs is known as transfer of training (Broad & Newstrom, 1992; Kirwan & Birchall, 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%