2014
DOI: 10.1111/nmo.12307
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Traditional measures of normal anal sphincter function using high‐resolution anorectal manometry (HRAM) in 115 healthy volunteers

Abstract: The study provides a large healthy volunteer dataset and parameters of traditional measures of anorectal function. A number of novel phenomena are appreciated, the significance of which will require further analysis and comparisons with patient populations.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

21
146
6
13

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 121 publications
(190 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
21
146
6
13
Order By: Relevance
“…22,23,27 Interestingly, anal resting pressure in healthy women was lower in a study from Korea 24 than in different studies from the United States and Europe. 7,22,26 These differences are more likely explained by differences in techniques rather than ethnic differences because anal pressures in healthy Asian volunteers 23,25 were similar to those from a group that included participants from Western countries. 7,22,26 The HR-ARM system (Sandhill Scientific) used in the Korean study 24 averages anal pressures across radial sensors at any level of the catheter.…”
Section: Resting Anal Sphincter Pressurementioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…22,23,27 Interestingly, anal resting pressure in healthy women was lower in a study from Korea 24 than in different studies from the United States and Europe. 7,22,26 These differences are more likely explained by differences in techniques rather than ethnic differences because anal pressures in healthy Asian volunteers 23,25 were similar to those from a group that included participants from Western countries. 7,22,26 The HR-ARM system (Sandhill Scientific) used in the Korean study 24 averages anal pressures across radial sensors at any level of the catheter.…”
Section: Resting Anal Sphincter Pressurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…7,22,26 These differences are more likely explained by differences in techniques rather than ethnic differences because anal pressures in healthy Asian volunteers 23,25 were similar to those from a group that included participants from Western countries. 7,22,26 The HR-ARM system (Sandhill Scientific) used in the Korean study 24 averages anal pressures across radial sensors at any level of the catheter. This might explain why pressures measured with the Sandhill HR-ARM catheter are lower than those measured with the eSleeve program (Given Imaging HR-ARM and HD-ARM).…”
Section: Resting Anal Sphincter Pressurementioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations