2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2018.04.042
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Traditional and nontraditional glycemic markers and risk of peripheral artery disease: The Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) study

Abstract: Nontraditional glycemic markers were associated with incident PAD independent of fasting glucose but not necessarily HbA1c. Our results also support the importance of glucose metabolism in the progression to CLI.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
13
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
13
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, with a shorter half-life than hemoglobin, glycated proteins reflect average glycemic burden of the previous 2-3 weeks and so may be better suited than HbA 1c to monitor shorter-term changes in glycemia (2,11). Higher glycated albumin and fructosamine levels have both been linked to increased risk of cardiovascular outcomes and mortality as well as to other important clinical outcomes (13)(14)(15)(16), and previous studies have suggested that glycated albumin and fructosamine may be comparable or superior to HbA 1c as a measure of glycemic control in patients treated with dialysis (3,(17)(18)(19)(20)(21). However, there are few data evaluating the performance of these alternative biomarkers compared with a gold-standard measure of glycemia in patients with eGFR ,60 mL/min/ 1.73 m 2 not treated with dialysis (2,19).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, with a shorter half-life than hemoglobin, glycated proteins reflect average glycemic burden of the previous 2-3 weeks and so may be better suited than HbA 1c to monitor shorter-term changes in glycemia (2,11). Higher glycated albumin and fructosamine levels have both been linked to increased risk of cardiovascular outcomes and mortality as well as to other important clinical outcomes (13)(14)(15)(16), and previous studies have suggested that glycated albumin and fructosamine may be comparable or superior to HbA 1c as a measure of glycemic control in patients treated with dialysis (3,(17)(18)(19)(20)(21). However, there are few data evaluating the performance of these alternative biomarkers compared with a gold-standard measure of glycemia in patients with eGFR ,60 mL/min/ 1.73 m 2 not treated with dialysis (2,19).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 28 In the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) study, the baseline HbA1c was a strong predictor for the occurrence of PAD. 29 Hjellestad et al 30 reported that preoperative HbA1c could predict mortality in patients with type 2 DM after surgical treatment for PAD. The mean HbA1c over 5 years could predict all-cause mortality in aged French patients with type 2 DM.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among traditional markers for glycemic control, hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) level was shown to be more strongly associated with PAD development than the fasting glucose level in patients with established DM in the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities study. 14 However, fasting glucose provided a better contribution to predict cardiovascular events than HbA1c in Taiwanese patients with type 2 DM. 15 It was recently reported that normal coronary artery was associated with a higher HbA1c level compared with documented coronary atherosclerosis on coronary computed tomography angiography in patients with type 2 DM.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%