The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2021
DOI: 10.2147/dmso.s330606
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Variability in Annual Fasting Glucose and the Risk of Peripheral Artery Disease in Patients with Diabetes Mellitus

Abstract: Purpose High glucose concentrations and swings are associated with endothelial dysfunction. We examined the effects of variability in fasting plasma glucose on peripheral artery disease (PAD) in patients with diabetes mellitus (DM). Patients and Methods In this screening study for the risk factors of PAD, we retrospectively collected data on the ankle-brachial index (ABI) and the percentage of mean arterial pressure (%MAP) at the ankle between August 01, 2016 and July 3… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 64 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…DPNP was an independent predictor of mortality after adjusting for all assessed potential risk factors; however, several nontraditional CV risks associated with DPN were not assessed in the present study (36). Variability of fasting glucose was reported to be associated with DPNP, peripheral artery disease, and mortality (37)(38)(39). Retinopathy was reported to be associated with DPN, CKD, and mortality (40,41).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…DPNP was an independent predictor of mortality after adjusting for all assessed potential risk factors; however, several nontraditional CV risks associated with DPN were not assessed in the present study (36). Variability of fasting glucose was reported to be associated with DPNP, peripheral artery disease, and mortality (37)(38)(39). Retinopathy was reported to be associated with DPN, CKD, and mortality (40,41).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 60%