2003
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.458722
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Trading Behaviour and the Performance of Daily Institutional Trades

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
38
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

4
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
5
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For all performance measures (with the exception of one-factor a), the concentration coefficient for the top 50 regressions is indistinguishable from zero. Thus, active managers appear to derive less informational value from large stocks, and this result is also consistent with the findings relating to trading performance by Gallagher and Looi (2006).…”
Section: Portfolio Concentration and Investment Manager Performancesupporting
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For all performance measures (with the exception of one-factor a), the concentration coefficient for the top 50 regressions is indistinguishable from zero. Thus, active managers appear to derive less informational value from large stocks, and this result is also consistent with the findings relating to trading performance by Gallagher and Looi (2006).…”
Section: Portfolio Concentration and Investment Manager Performancesupporting
confidence: 87%
“…documented inconsistent evidence with the efficient markets hypothesis, where some value-added is achievable and therefore consistent with the Grossman and Stiglitz (1980) informational equilibrium (e.g. Grinblatt and Titman 1989;Daniel et al 1997;Chen et al 2000;Wermers 2000;Pinnuck 2003;Gallagher and Looi 2006). In particular, Wermers (2000) has contributed significantly to this literature by re-opening the debate about the value of active management, where he utilizes a database of security holdings for US mutual funds.…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Based on the size of the funds in terms of funds under management, the sample represents five of the top 10 Australian institutional fund managers, four ranked 11-20, five ranked 21-30 and the remainder are outside the largest 30 managers. A more detailed description of the database is available in Gallagher and Looi (2006) and Brands et al (2006). Comparison of the return on the funds in our sample and the broader population of investment funds provided by Mercer Investment Consulting showed that the two sets of returns were almost identical.…”
Section: Data and Sample Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…13 The sample period for this study is 1 January 1993 to 31 December 2003. Further details concerning the construction and composition of the database can be obtained from Brown et al (2005), Gallagher and Looi (2006), and Foster et al (2005). These studies also…”
Section: A Datamentioning
confidence: 99%