Abstract:This study provides an empirical examination of derivative instruments used by institutional investors. Our analysis provides a unique insight into the role and benefits of derivative securities in active equity portfolio management. We contribute to the literature by using a database that comprises the periodic portfolio holdings and daily trades of institutional fund managers. The consequence of derivative use is analyzed using a number of performance and risk measures. Overall, we find the use of derivative… Show more
“…However, over the entire sample period there are no significant differences between derivative users and non-users. These results are consistent with Koski andPontiff (1999), Fong, Gallagher andNg (2005) and Pinnuck (2004) who find no significant differences in risk and performance measures between users and nonusers of derivatives. (1) where ∆ RISK is the change in the risk variable between the first six-months and the second six-months in a year.…”
Section: Descriptive Statisticssupporting
confidence: 88%
“…The performance, risk and turnover for option users are not significantly different to non-users. Fong, Gallagher and Ng (2005) examine institutional funds and find no difference between users and non-users of derivatives in terms of their performance and risk characteristics. Their results show that options are used to gain exposure to momentum stocks.…”
Section: Derivative Use By Australian Fund Managersmentioning
In this paper we examine the extent to which derivatives are used to affect the risk-shifting behaviour of Australian equity fund managers. We find, after periods of good and poor performance, the risk-shifting behaviour of fund managers is different between derivative users and non-users. Our results support the gaming and active competition hypotheses but there is little support for the cash flow hypothesis. The study also allows for a complex reporting environment by analysing data across three alternate time periods: the calendar year, financial year and quarterly frames. Given that our results are not consistent across time periods for users and non-users of derivatives, some caution in interpretation is required.
“…However, over the entire sample period there are no significant differences between derivative users and non-users. These results are consistent with Koski andPontiff (1999), Fong, Gallagher andNg (2005) and Pinnuck (2004) who find no significant differences in risk and performance measures between users and nonusers of derivatives. (1) where ∆ RISK is the change in the risk variable between the first six-months and the second six-months in a year.…”
Section: Descriptive Statisticssupporting
confidence: 88%
“…The performance, risk and turnover for option users are not significantly different to non-users. Fong, Gallagher and Ng (2005) examine institutional funds and find no difference between users and non-users of derivatives in terms of their performance and risk characteristics. Their results show that options are used to gain exposure to momentum stocks.…”
Section: Derivative Use By Australian Fund Managersmentioning
In this paper we examine the extent to which derivatives are used to affect the risk-shifting behaviour of Australian equity fund managers. We find, after periods of good and poor performance, the risk-shifting behaviour of fund managers is different between derivative users and non-users. Our results support the gaming and active competition hypotheses but there is little support for the cash flow hypothesis. The study also allows for a complex reporting environment by analysing data across three alternate time periods: the calendar year, financial year and quarterly frames. Given that our results are not consistent across time periods for users and non-users of derivatives, some caution in interpretation is required.
“…Hitherto, the literature had to rely on rather low-frequency reporting data. In this way, we can complement previous evidence on which types of derivatives equity funds use (e.g., Fong, Gallagher and Ng, 2005;Cao, Ghysels and Hatheway, 2011;Cici and Palacios, 2015;Natter et al, 2016;Benz et al, 2019).…”
“…All mutual funds that use derivatives are aggregated into a single group and effectively no distinction is made between different types of derivative trading strategies. This broad classification method is also employed in studies of derivative use by investment managers in the UK (Fletcher et al, 2002), in Canada (Johnson and Yu, 2004) and Australia (Fong et al, 2005;Pinnuck, 2004). As such the analyses contained in Koski and Pontiff, as well as these other studies, are only able to provide insight into 'average' derivative trading behaviour.…”
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.