2019
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-24914-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Trade Unions on YouTube

Abstract: use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this book are included in the book's Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the book's Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitt… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
(48 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Digital audiences appear to be more complicated than traditional audiences and, despite members being the main audience that unions actively refer to, there is a wide variety of other audiences following union accounts, engaging with them or being mentioned in unions’ tweets. Twitter interactions are not as straightforward as members following their respective unions to learn about their activities and participate (Hodder and Houghton, 2015; Panagiotopoulos and Barnett, 2015; Geelan and Hodder, 2017; Jansson and Uba, 2019). Most union accounts are being followed by influential stakeholders with significant amplification potential (e.g.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Digital audiences appear to be more complicated than traditional audiences and, despite members being the main audience that unions actively refer to, there is a wide variety of other audiences following union accounts, engaging with them or being mentioned in unions’ tweets. Twitter interactions are not as straightforward as members following their respective unions to learn about their activities and participate (Hodder and Houghton, 2015; Panagiotopoulos and Barnett, 2015; Geelan and Hodder, 2017; Jansson and Uba, 2019). Most union accounts are being followed by influential stakeholders with significant amplification potential (e.g.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An even larger variety of followers was observed in the Twitter account of the transnational organisation Union Solidarity International (Geelan and Hodder, 2017). Outside Twitter’s open information network, unions have attempted to reach out to members or potential members in channels for more targeted engagement like YouTube (Jansson and Uba, 2019).…”
Section: Conceptualising Unions’ Digital Audiencesmentioning
confidence: 99%