Trade policy shocks in the UK textile and apparel value chain: Firm perceptions of Brexit uncertainty

Abstract

Since the 2008 economic and financial crisis, the rise of populism and nationalism has been associated with increased protectionism and policy uncertainty in the world trade system, with profound side effects for international business (IB) activities and global value chains (GVCs). The aim of this paper is to investigate the way trade policy uncertainty linked to Brexit has affected firms’ behaviors along the GVC of the UK textile and apparel (T&A) industry. We draw upon data from an original survey carried out between June 2019 and January 2020 with 688 firms amongst UK T&A manufacturers, designers, and retailers to grasp their perception of Brexit uncertainty. We show that the uncertainty over trade policy between the UK and the EU – started in the wake of the 2016 referendum – has affected a significant number of firms operating upstream and downstream of the UK T&A value chain, which shows clear signs of ongoing restructuring. Our findings also provide some preliminary evidence of the way the (perceived) effects of trade policy uncertainty may vary depending on firms’ position, production phase, and degree of integration in the GVC. Policy directions for supporting the UK T&A value chain post-Brexit and implications for future IB research are discussed.

[Retracted] Global Value Chain Governance of the Apparel Design Industry under the Background of Global Sustainable Economic Development

“…Te apparel industry's purchaser responsibilities and expectations updating prospects operational (crossing to higher-value functions), consumer (producing higher-value items), procedural (incorporating sophisticated technologies into production), and multisectoral (moving across companies) (Garg [19] and Casadei and Iammarino [20]).…”

Towards Financing System of Integrated Enterprise Development in the Time of COVID-19 Outbreak

“…However, under the crisis conditions, enterprises have to operate mainly amidst a decline in sales due to a decrease in demand and purchasing power (Li et al 2021). Product innovations typically require large capital investments in manufacturing technology, which is also currently scarce (Casadei and Iammarino 2021). Enhancement of operational efficiency, i.e., improving product quality while reducing costs, is also an unlikely source of growth, due to rising raw material costs for many businesses (Mallinguh et al 2020).…”

Strategic Intelligence of Small and Medium Enterprises Embedded in Global Supply Chains: A Framework for Resilience in the Face of Systemic Risks

“…The manifestation of systemic risks is multifaceted, taking on several forms and bringing about profound transformations within global supply chains. Political crises, such as Brexit (Roscoe, Skipworth, Aktas, & Habib, 2020;Casadei & Iammarino, 2021;Moradlou et al, 2021) or major trade conflicts (Fusacchia, 2019;Wang & Hewings, 2020), along with Russia's invasion of Ukraine and subsequent Western sanctions (Simmons, Culkin & Davies, 2022), illustrate the increasing uncertainty faced by businesses integrated into these global networks. Health crises, such as the COVID-19 pandemic, have exposed deep vulnerabilities by causing massive disruptions in supply chains.…”

“…Indeed, the manifestation of systemic risks, due to their scale, results in widespread disruptions in global supply chains. It leads to physical damage to production networks, amplifies supply and demand volatility, increases supply lead times and costs, and generates significant contextual uncertainty (Casadei & Iammarino, 2021;Golan, Jernegan & Linkov, 2020;Roscoe et al, 2020;Dooley et al, 2010;Juttner & Maklan, 2011;Belhadi et al, 2021;Chen, Wang & Zhong, 2021;Kahiluoto, Mäkinen, & Kaseva, 2020). In response to these challenges, the concept of supply chain resilience emerges.…”