2016
DOI: 10.1093/beheco/arw089
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Trade-offs between energy maximization and parental care in a central place forager, the sea otter

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
35
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 91 publications
4
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While optimal foraging models do not predict a resource switch, the trip duration increase matches predictions of the marginal value theorem for central place foragers, whereby individuals forced to travel/search longer for resources spend longer foraging in selected patches (i.e. increase total foraging trip duration) (Charnov, ; Thometz et al ., ). If increased foraging trip duration of bumble bees occurs when resources are relatively more scarce, then foraging trip duration could serve as a useful proxy for resource abundance in lieu of more painstaking methods of estimating resource abundance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…While optimal foraging models do not predict a resource switch, the trip duration increase matches predictions of the marginal value theorem for central place foragers, whereby individuals forced to travel/search longer for resources spend longer foraging in selected patches (i.e. increase total foraging trip duration) (Charnov, ; Thometz et al ., ). If increased foraging trip duration of bumble bees occurs when resources are relatively more scarce, then foraging trip duration could serve as a useful proxy for resource abundance in lieu of more painstaking methods of estimating resource abundance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…() (as measured by foraging duration). Similar foraging patterns relative to resource abundance, with shorter trips that take less time when resources are locally abundant, have been observed in other taxa, including mammals (Thometz et al ., ) and birds (Tremblay et al ., ), suggesting that organisms make similar foraging decisions across diverse clades. The behavioural tracking of resource abundance is also evidence of foraging flexibility within bumble bee colonies (Spiesman & Gratton, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For a small marine mammal with limited energy reserves, this prolonged and sustained increase in daily metabolic demands represents an extreme energetic challenge. Despite foraging as much as 50-60% of each day (Esslinger et al, 2014;Thometz et al, 2014;Thometz et al, 2016), females are often in negative energy balance during lactation (Chinn et al, 2016). Further, any delay in independent foraging by pups can greatly increase the energetic burden on adult females during an already energetically taxing period when onboard reserves have been depleted.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, T 3 decreased in resource‐limited otters, suggesting downregulation of metabolism under stronger nutritional constraints. Sea otters under resource limitation stress may face intense prey competition, increased foraging effort (number of dives, dive length, and foraging bout duration), and still experience a negative energy balance (Thometz, Staedler, et al., ; Tinker et al., ). It may be adaptive for individuals under nutrient restriction to decrease thyroid levels to decrease metabolic rate, and thus energy requirements.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Respirometry studies indicate that a mother's daily energy consumption increases 85–110% over nonlactating periods (Thometz, Kendall, Richter, & Williams, ; Thometz, Tinker, Staedler, Mayer, & Williams, ). Despite increasing their foraging effort to as much as 60% of each 24‐h period (Esslinger et al., ; Thometz, Staedler, et al., ), females in resource‐limited environments are often emaciated by the end of lactation. The extreme energetic demands elicited by lactation and pup‐rearing, in addition to exogenous stressors such as resource limitation (Tinker, Doak, & Estes, ; Tinker et al., ), can increase risk of metabolic collapse and mortality, a phenomenon known as “End‐Lactation Syndrome” (ELS) (Chinn et al., ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%