1995
DOI: 10.22230/cjc.1995v20n3a882
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Trade Integration and Communication Networks in Latin America

Abstract: Over the last few years, academic discussions about the state of communications in the Americas, particularly those discussions taking place in the northern part of the continent, sometimes slide into one or more of the following misunderstandings: the provincialist view, which considers the entire hemisphere to be involved in a single process of trade liberalization, like the NAFTA; the overly simplified view, which assumes that the southern countries are a homogeneous group, from the point of view of cultura… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0
1

Year Published

2003
2003
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Este mismo autor (2005) toma como referencia el trabajo de Roncagliolo (1995) y nombra a México y Brasil como exportadores netos y los más antiguos en el mercado, seguidos de nuevos exportadores como Venezuela y Argentina, y los más recientes, Colombia, Perú y Chile.…”
Section: Revisión Bibliográficaunclassified
“…Este mismo autor (2005) toma como referencia el trabajo de Roncagliolo (1995) y nombra a México y Brasil como exportadores netos y los más antiguos en el mercado, seguidos de nuevos exportadores como Venezuela y Argentina, y los más recientes, Colombia, Perú y Chile.…”
Section: Revisión Bibliográficaunclassified
“…It is long-standing, having been identified in the early 1970s by writers concerned with international program flows, notably Nordenstreng and Varis (1974). Just as in the English-speaking world, the system of exchange is unequal, with a limited number of producers based in just a few countries dominating the trade (Roncagliolo 1995), and in spite of the similarities of language, there are nevertheless "cultural discounts" that certain nations impose against the products of others (Hoskins and Mirus 1988). With these qualifications, it can be understood as a "geolinguistic region," that is, a regional space defined by not just geographical but cultural and linguistic proximity (Sinclair 1999).…”
Section: Miami As Geolinguistic Nodementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This has resulted in the rise of some countries as media powerhouses while others have lagged behind. This industrial imbalance was described by Roncagliolo (1995) with his taxonomy of net exporters (Mexico and Brazil), new exporters (Venezuela), and net importers (U.S. Hispanic). Sa´nchez Ruiz (2000b) points out how in the 1990s, the Ibero-American televisual space was overwhelmingly dominated by only five corporations from Brazil, Mexico, Spain, and Venezuela (Globo TV, Televisa, TVE, Venevision, and RCTV), which comprised 90% of total regional exports.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%