2016
DOI: 10.20955/wp.2016.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Trade and Terrorism: A Disaggregated Approach

Abstract: This paper constructs a model of trade consequences of terrorism, where firms in trading nations face different costs arising from domestic and transnational terrorism. Using dyadic dataset in a gravity model, we test terrorism's effects on overall trade, exports, and imports, while allowing for disaggregation by primary commodities and manufacturing goods. While terrorism has little or no influence on trade of primary products, terrorism reduces trade of manufactured goods. This novel finding pinpoints the av… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The literature usually utilizes the gravity model, which is the standard in the empirical trade literature. The adverse effect of terrorism on trade is shown for the period of the dominance by the leftist terrorist groups (e.g., Nitsch and Schumacher 2004) as well as for the era of dominance by the religious fundamentalist terrorists (e.g., Bandyopadhyay, Sandler, and Younas 2018). Egger and Gassebner (2015) are an exception; they discern a negligible non-robust effect of terrorism on trade in the short run.…”
Section: Trade and Terrorismmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The literature usually utilizes the gravity model, which is the standard in the empirical trade literature. The adverse effect of terrorism on trade is shown for the period of the dominance by the leftist terrorist groups (e.g., Nitsch and Schumacher 2004) as well as for the era of dominance by the religious fundamentalist terrorists (e.g., Bandyopadhyay, Sandler, and Younas 2018). Egger and Gassebner (2015) are an exception; they discern a negligible non-robust effect of terrorism on trade in the short run.…”
Section: Trade and Terrorismmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Terrorism has relevant economic consequences, as it negatively affects growth (Abadie and Gardeazabal, 2003;Blomberg et al, 2004;Gaibulloev and Sandler, 2008;Meierrieks and Gries, 2013), capital markets (Chen and Siems, 2004) and trade (Bandyopadhyay et al, 2018). Attempts to estimate the economic costs of terrorism generally consider direct costs (loss of lives, severity of injuries, value of damaged structures, etc.)…”
Section: Related Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…De Sousa et al (2018) show that the presence of terror networks may cause neighboring countries to affect a nation's trade. Bandyopadhyay et al (2018) show that terror has different effects on trade of manufacturing and primary products. Building on the insights of the extant literature, we present a simple model that analyzes how own and neighbor terrorism may affect trade and production costs and thereby affect imports of a nation.…”
Section: Model: Effects Of Own and Neighboring Nation Terrorism On Immentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We adapt a version of the standard monopolistic competition model of Helpman et al (2008) used in Bandyopadhyay et al (2018). There are J nations trading in differentiated products.…”
Section: Model: Effects Of Own and Neighboring Nation Terrorism On Immentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation