1987
DOI: 10.7208/chicago/9780226070308.001.0001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Trade and Structural Change in Pacific Asia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

1989
1989
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Need for a Continuum Recently, Bradford and Branson (1987) and Edwards (1988) have argued that in order to rescue the policy debate from its current overly ideologized overtones it is necessary to think, once again, of trade regimes as a continuum. Table 1 contains the typology suggested by Bradford and Branson (1987).…”
Section: Naturally If Bmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The Need for a Continuum Recently, Bradford and Branson (1987) and Edwards (1988) have argued that in order to rescue the policy debate from its current overly ideologized overtones it is necessary to think, once again, of trade regimes as a continuum. Table 1 contains the typology suggested by Bradford and Branson (1987).…”
Section: Naturally If Bmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, an increasing number of authors have recently begun to recognize these problems. For instance in an interesting paper on the experience of the East Asian nations, Bradford and Branson (1987) say:…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 6 The supply response to the changes in relative prices associated with the trade reforms has remained sluggish in many countries, however. The primary contributing factors have been restrictive domestic 15 For discussions see 3radford andBranson (1987), andBalassa (1982).…”
Section: Commercial Policy Reformmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many empirical studies have examined the mechanisms and sources of the so-called East Asian "miracle" (e.g., Ng and Yeats, 2003;Bradford and Branson, 1987;Park and Park, 1992;World Bank, 1993). These studies suggest the importance of changing comparative advantage in the composition of US-East Asia trade.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%