2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.jinteco.2006.05.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Trade agreements with domestic policies as disguised protection

Abstract: WTO rules prohibit "disguised protection" in the form of domestic policies. How then do governments cooperate over trade and domestic policies when none can verify whether a nation's domestic tax reduction is a protective measure or a reaction to a production externality? In this paper, each government privately observes whether a production externality associated with its import-competing good is high or low. This paper finds that in an optimal agreement, disguised protection with domestic policies is never u… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
23
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A similar result appears inBagwell and Staiger (2001) Prop 1-the terms of trade seeking "does not distort the policy mix"-and inLee (2007).…”
supporting
confidence: 65%
“…A similar result appears inBagwell and Staiger (2001) Prop 1-the terms of trade seeking "does not distort the policy mix"-and inLee (2007).…”
supporting
confidence: 65%
“…In the StaigerSykes model, the domestic government 82 Lee (2007) considers a related model but with the important difference that each government is privately informed about the magnitude of the domestic production externality in its country. As Lee shows, in this case it may be optimal to distort the tariff in order to limit the potential for disguised protectionism, which occurs when a government misrepresents its information by selecting a low production tax even though the externality cost is high.…”
Section: The Principle Of National Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(Recent theoretical papers include Ederington 2001;Bond & Park 2002;Chisik 2003;Agur 2008;Bagwell & Staiger 2003, 2005aLimao 2005;Lee 2007;Zissimos 2007;Klimenko et al 2008;Martin & Vergote 2008;Bagwell 2009;Beshkar 2009;Park 2009;and Limao & Saggi 2008. Related empirical work includes Prusa &Skeath 2001 andBlonigen &Bown 2003.…”
Section: Enforcement and Dispute Settlement Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%