2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2014.08.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tracking seasonal changes of leaf and canopy light use efficiency in a Phlomis fruticosa Mediterranean ecosystem using field measurements and multi-angular satellite hyperspectral imagery

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
17
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 78 publications
1
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…MODIS and CHRIS/PROBA are common operational instruments for studying PRI at ecosystemic and regional scales [9,60,131,132]. Alterations in the angle at which satellites detect seasonal fluctuations of illumination, the shadow fraction detected by the sensor and atmospheric effects were identified as critical influences on PRI signals on a spatial scale [31,71,79,133], with the exception of some relatively uniform and dense canopy structures and a low variability of shadow fractions [71].…”
Section: Ecosystemic Levelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…MODIS and CHRIS/PROBA are common operational instruments for studying PRI at ecosystemic and regional scales [9,60,131,132]. Alterations in the angle at which satellites detect seasonal fluctuations of illumination, the shadow fraction detected by the sensor and atmospheric effects were identified as critical influences on PRI signals on a spatial scale [31,71,79,133], with the exception of some relatively uniform and dense canopy structures and a low variability of shadow fractions [71].…”
Section: Ecosystemic Levelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alterations in the angle at which satellites detect seasonal fluctuations of illumination, the shadow fraction detected by the sensor and atmospheric effects were identified as critical influences on PRI signals on a spatial scale [31,71,79,133], with the exception of some relatively uniform and dense canopy structures and a low variability of shadow fractions [71]. PRI obtained from the backscatter direction [25,60,132] nonetheless minimized the effect of shadows, and near-nadir satellite observations [79] that reduced the effects of soil background and atmospheric scattering were also optimal and improved the accuracy of RUE detection. PRI performance was improved in forward-scattering directions after replacing the PRI formulation wavelength, which indicates a possible shift in the signal of xanthophyllic de-epoxidation with the direction of detection.…”
Section: Ecosystemic Levelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, a best direction with a proper sunlit/shaded foliage ratio, a structure-based parameter, needs to be considered when using the BRDF model to interpret canopy PRI. Furthermore, the contribution of the background to the reflectance of the forest canopy varyies with the changing view angle [31,74], and it is hard to eliminate the influence of the background signal using the semi-empirical kernel-driven model.…”
Section: Uncertainties In the Relationship Between Pri And Luementioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, Nakaji et al [30] exhibited limited sensitivity of the PRI to LUE, while a model with both PRI and VPD as predictors is able to significantly improve LUE estimation for a tropical evergreen rainforest, as there is no clearly defined dry/rainy season cycle. In Mediterranean forests, which often suffer heat and drought stress in summer, PRI is successfully used to detect water stress on LUE and assess LUE across different seasons [31,[88][89][90][91].…”
Section: Unresolved Questionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation