2014
DOI: 10.3138/ptc.2013-19bc
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tracking Patient Outcomes after Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

Abstract: Purpose: To model how patients' knee range of motion (ROM), pain, and self-reported lower-extremity (LE) functional status change over the first 26 weeks following anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction and to estimate the test-retest reliability of these measurements. Methods: Patients were assessed weekly over 26 weeks following ACL reconstruction. Outcomes were knee ROM, LE functional status measured by the Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS), and pain measured by the 4-item pain intensity meas… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

2
12
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
(24 reference statements)
2
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The predictive values of the average of LSI SHT and THT scores confirmed these results. We report a functional recovery similar to the general growth model described by Cupido et al [34] with a plateau phase around 39 postoperative weeks. This is the first study to investigate the evolution of functional recovery after ACLR using SHT and THT between 12 and 52 postoperative weeks.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…The predictive values of the average of LSI SHT and THT scores confirmed these results. We report a functional recovery similar to the general growth model described by Cupido et al [34] with a plateau phase around 39 postoperative weeks. This is the first study to investigate the evolution of functional recovery after ACLR using SHT and THT between 12 and 52 postoperative weeks.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…This proof of concept study lacked a control group following the initial 10‐min treatment period within the recovery room; and, therefore documentation and quantification of analgesia delivery and opioid sparing require additional investigation. However, the reported pain scores and oral opioid requirements of the current feasibility study are dramatically lower than published controls; and, the specific type of reconstruction included in our study—utilizing a patellar autograft—frequently produces more pain than alternative techniques . The significant potential opioid sparing is particularly noteworthy given the current opioid epidemic and desire to replace opioids as the main postoperative analgesic modality .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…The mean (range) implantation time for individual leads was 11 (7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20)(21)(22)(23)(24)(25) min, which included equipment setup for any second lead attempt. However, because five subjects had multiple lead insertions, the mean (range) overall treatment time for each subject was 15 (10-32) min.…”
Section: Lead Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also it prevents forward movement of the tibia in relation to the femur [2]; therefore, trauma which is happened by an injury to the ligament can cause static and dynamic knee instability, reduce the range of motion, decrease balance, and ultimately decrease professional activity [2,3]. Pain, swelling, and movement limitations, such as reduction in knee range of motion, strength, and knee function, are other common outcomes after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction [4].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%