2019
DOI: 10.1109/joe.2018.2811419
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Track-Before-Detect Bearings-Only Localization Performance in Complex Passive Sonar Scenarios: A Case Study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For lower complexity, PF samples the state-space to estimate the probability density function for target reflections [11]. Tracking of an underwater moving source by PF is demonstrated in [22], while [23] demonstrated a PF-based TkBD algorithm on a multi-target passive sonar scenario. In turn, the PMHT approach [24] models a combination of target and noise using the expectation maximization (EM) algorithm, and estimates the target's path by a Kalman smoother.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For lower complexity, PF samples the state-space to estimate the probability density function for target reflections [11]. Tracking of an underwater moving source by PF is demonstrated in [22], while [23] demonstrated a PF-based TkBD algorithm on a multi-target passive sonar scenario. In turn, the PMHT approach [24] models a combination of target and noise using the expectation maximization (EM) algorithm, and estimates the target's path by a Kalman smoother.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Passive acoustic localization has attracted significant attention for its multitudinous applications in localization, navigation, surveillance and other fields. However, it is a challenging problem due to the nonlinearity of the measurements, low signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), high false alarm, and high miss detection rate [1][2]. Traditional localization can be achieved by utilizing the estimated parameters related to the position of the target, such as time difference of arrival (TDOA), angle of arrival (AOA), frequency difference of arrival (FDOA), and the strength of the received signal [3][4][5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the passive tracking process sometimes is called the bearing-only tracking in a 2D scenario and angle-only tracking in a 3D scenario. The observability analyses are comprehensively studied by several researchers [ 9 , 10 , 11 ], and the conclusion is made that the angle-only measurements by a single static observer is not sufficient to guarantee the system to be fully observable. In order to make a tracking system observable to satisfy the robustness requirements of the passive tracking system, the single observer must maneuver with much more agility than the target or more observers are needed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%