2020
DOI: 10.3390/pr8080977
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tracing the Scientific History of Fe0-Based Environmental Remediation Prior to the Advent of Permeable Reactive Barriers

Abstract: The technology of using metallic iron (Fe0) for in situ generation of iron oxides for water treatment is a very old one. The Fe0 remediation technology has been re-discovered in the framework of groundwater remediation using permeable reactive barriers (PRBs). Despite its simplicity, the improvement of Fe0 PRBs is fraught with difficulties regarding their operating modes. The literature dealing with Fe0 remediation contains ambiguities regarding its invention and its development. The present paper examines the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
35
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 75 publications
1
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In particular, the mechanism discussed here started in 1994 [16], but Khudenko [77] has been completely ignored since then; yet, this should be the starting point. The concept that Fe 0 is an environmental-reducing agent has never been established, as recently demonstrated by Ebelle et al [75], but is still prevailing in both the old and recent literature [84][85][86][87].…”
Section: Implications On Contaminant Removal Mechanismsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In particular, the mechanism discussed here started in 1994 [16], but Khudenko [77] has been completely ignored since then; yet, this should be the starting point. The concept that Fe 0 is an environmental-reducing agent has never been established, as recently demonstrated by Ebelle et al [75], but is still prevailing in both the old and recent literature [84][85][86][87].…”
Section: Implications On Contaminant Removal Mechanismsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is hoped that, in establishing that contaminant removals in Fe 0 /H 2 O systems are due to flocculation (adsorption and coprecipitation) ( Figure 6) [89], the results presented herein will redirect the research for the design of the next generation of Fe 0 -based remediation systems, accounting for the ion-selective nature of the systems [14,84,[89][90][91][92]. The view that Fe 0 is a reducing agent [15,93,94] should be immediately abandoned [85]. This view has mediated or supported wrong wordings like zero-valent iron for metallic [14] or reductates for species reducible by Fe 0 according to the relative electrode potentials [94].…”
Section: Implications On Contaminant Removal Mechanismsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The conclusion of Seng et al 84 supports the view presented herein that the relative kinetics of Fe 0 and FeS 2 oxidation determinate the preponderance of processes in Fe 0 /FeS 2 /H 2 O systems 70 . However, the reported selectivity of the process is questionable as sand and other natural minerals are also covered with FeCPs under similar conditions 29 , 87 89 . As an example, Song et al 87 reported on increased Cr VI reduction in Fe 0 /sand/H 2 O systems compared to Fe 0 /H 2 O ones.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The discussion given herein clearly suggests that if there are differential removal mechanisms, it is due to the differential extent of pH shift. Future research should be designed based on the chemistry of the systems 89 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research during the past two decades has rediscovered ltration systems based on metallic iron (Fe 0 ) as an affordable, applicable, and e cient water treatment technology for decentralized water supply (e.g. households and small communities) [3,7,[9][10][11][12][13]. Such Fe 0 lters are only sustainable upon admixing Fe 0 with other aggregates like granular activated carbon, biochar, gravel, magnetite (Fe 3 O 4 ), manganese oxides (MnO x ), pyrite (FeS 2 ), and sand [10,14,15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%