2019
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stz043
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tracing the formation of the Milky Way through ultra metal-poor stars

Abstract: We use Gaia DR2 astrometric and photometric data, published radial velocities and MESA models to infer distances, orbits, surface gravities, and effective temperatures for all ultra metal-poor stars ([Fe/H] < −4.0 dex) available in the literature. Assuming that these stars are old (> 11 Gyr) and that they are expected to belong to the Milky Way halo, we find that these 42 stars (18 dwarf stars and 24 giants or sub-giants) are currently within ∼ 20 kpc of the Sun and that they map a wide variety of orbits. A la… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

27
139
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 99 publications
(166 citation statements)
references
References 93 publications
(101 reference statements)
27
139
0
Order By: Relevance
“…More importantly, the sample exhibits a strong asymmetry between prograde (J φ > 0) and retrograde (J φ < 0) stars, where prograde stars dominate with an angular momentum up to the Sun's value. The bottom panels of Figure 1 show the same action plot divided into 4 metallicity bins, respectively the UMP stars populated only by the 42 stars from Sestito et al (2019), the −4.0 < [Fe/H] ≤ −3.0 bin, the −3.0 < [Fe/H] ≤ −2.5 regime, and, to be complete, the bin with −2.5 < [Fe/H] ≤ −2.0, where the signature of a disk population was already discovered (Beers et al 2002;Reddy & Lambert 2008;Ruchti et al 2011;Li & Zhao 2017). Separating the sample in these metallicity bins makes it evident that the prograde stars that remain close to the MW plane inhabit all [Fe/H] ranges.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…More importantly, the sample exhibits a strong asymmetry between prograde (J φ > 0) and retrograde (J φ < 0) stars, where prograde stars dominate with an angular momentum up to the Sun's value. The bottom panels of Figure 1 show the same action plot divided into 4 metallicity bins, respectively the UMP stars populated only by the 42 stars from Sestito et al (2019), the −4.0 < [Fe/H] ≤ −3.0 bin, the −3.0 < [Fe/H] ≤ −2.5 regime, and, to be complete, the bin with −2.5 < [Fe/H] ≤ −2.0, where the signature of a disk population was already discovered (Beers et al 2002;Reddy & Lambert 2008;Ruchti et al 2011;Li & Zhao 2017). Separating the sample in these metallicity bins makes it evident that the prograde stars that remain close to the MW plane inhabit all [Fe/H] ranges.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This Bayesian method to infer distance does not require a reliable parallax measurement, but does take into account all parallax information available (even negative values). As discussed in Sestito et al (2019), the choice of the MW density prior affects the results only when the distance PDF has two solutions ( i.e., both a dwarf and a giant solution) changing the probabilities associated to the two solutions, but not the values of the distances. After finding that a significant fraction of UMP stars reside close to the MW plane (Sestito et al 2019), we therefore chose a MW density prior composed by the sum of a halo component described by a power law, and a disk component described by an exponential distribution law.…”
Section: Determination Of Distances and Orbital Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations