2021
DOI: 10.1002/asna.202113867
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Metal‐poor stars observed with the automated planet finder telescope. III. CEMP‐no stars are the descendant of population III stars

Abstract: This study reports a probabilistic insight into the stellar-mass and supernovae (SNe) explosion energy of five CEMP-no stars' possible progenitors. As such, a direct comparison between the abundance ratios [X/Fe] of the light-elements and the predicted nucleosynthetic yields of SN of high-mass metal-free stars has been performed. This comparison suggests that the possible progenitors have a stellar-mass range of 11 − 22 M ⊙ and explosion energies of 0.3 − 1.8 × 10 51 erg.In addition, we investigate the kinemat… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…CEMP-no stars are the dominant fraction of stars with [Fe/ H] < -3.0 (e.g., Aoki et al 2007;Yoon et al 2016). Because of their low-metallicity nature and low abundances of neutroncapture elements, they are regarded as the likely direct descendants of Population III stars (Christlieb et al 2002;Frebel et al 2005;Caffau et al 2011;Keller et al 2014;Placco et al 2016;Yoon et al 2016;Hartwig et al 2018;Starkenburg et al 2018;Almusleh et al 2021;. The C and O enrichment of CEMP-no stars is expected to have a profound impact on the formation of low-mass stars, since these species play a major role as efficient gas coolants, so that low-mass stars can form in even extremely low-metallicity environments (Bromm & Loeb 2003;Norris et al 2013;Frebel & Norris 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CEMP-no stars are the dominant fraction of stars with [Fe/ H] < -3.0 (e.g., Aoki et al 2007;Yoon et al 2016). Because of their low-metallicity nature and low abundances of neutroncapture elements, they are regarded as the likely direct descendants of Population III stars (Christlieb et al 2002;Frebel et al 2005;Caffau et al 2011;Keller et al 2014;Placco et al 2016;Yoon et al 2016;Hartwig et al 2018;Starkenburg et al 2018;Almusleh et al 2021;. The C and O enrichment of CEMP-no stars is expected to have a profound impact on the formation of low-mass stars, since these species play a major role as efficient gas coolants, so that low-mass stars can form in even extremely low-metallicity environments (Bromm & Loeb 2003;Norris et al 2013;Frebel & Norris 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Umeda & Nomoto 2003Iwamoto et al 2005;Tominaga et al 2007;Ishigaki et al 2014;Bonifacio et al 2015). Recent models comparing the chemical abundances of five CEMP-no stars and the predicted SN yields confirm that SNe with a stellar mass of 11-22 M ⊙ and low explosion energies, 0.3-1.8×10 51 erg, are possible progenitors of CEMP-no stars (Almusleh et al 2021). However, massive and fast-rotating low-metallicity 'spinstars' have also been proposed as possible sources of enrichment for the birth environment of CEMP-no stars (Meynet et al 2006;Maeder et al 2015).…”
Section: Spite Et Al (2013bmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…Umeda & Nomoto 2003Iwamoto et al 2005;Tominaga et al 2007;Ishigaki et al 2014;Bonifacio et al 2015). Recent models comparing the chemical abundances of five CEMP-no stars and the predicted SN yields confirm that SNe with a stellar mass of 11-22 M ⊙ and low explosion energies, 0.3-1.8×10 51 erg, are possible progenitors of CEMP-no stars (Almusleh et al 2021). However, massive and fast-rotating low-metallicity 'spinstars' have also been proposed as possible sources of enrichment for the birth environment of CEMPno stars (Meynet et al 2006;Maeder et al 2015).…”
Section: Spitementioning
confidence: 81%