2008
DOI: 10.1016/s1808-8694(15)30597-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tracheal inflammatory response to bacterial cellulose dressing after surgical scarification in rabbits

Abstract: We did not observe differences between the study and control groups as far as inflammation and scarring are concerned. There were no inflammatory signs associated with the use of the cellulose membrane that did no occur because of surgery.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
(45 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It has also been used as a substitute for meninges, dorsum of the nose, tympanic membrane, as a lining for intravascular prostheses, and in the trachea to avoid circumferential stenosis. [25][26][27][28] Although the material has been tested in other animal models, the evaluation did not included the larynx; hence, situations, such as tissue reaction, material absorption, and extrusion, need to be addressed to evaluate its usefulness as a material for laryngeal reconstruction. The aim of this study was to evaluate the medialization, inflammatory response, and healing of rabbit vocal folds after implantation of a membrane of bacterial cellulose.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has also been used as a substitute for meninges, dorsum of the nose, tympanic membrane, as a lining for intravascular prostheses, and in the trachea to avoid circumferential stenosis. [25][26][27][28] Although the material has been tested in other animal models, the evaluation did not included the larynx; hence, situations, such as tissue reaction, material absorption, and extrusion, need to be addressed to evaluate its usefulness as a material for laryngeal reconstruction. The aim of this study was to evaluate the medialization, inflammatory response, and healing of rabbit vocal folds after implantation of a membrane of bacterial cellulose.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…BC was observed to allow the repairing of dural defects in rabbit and had a decreased inflammatory response compared to traditional materials. Panerari et al [72] studied in vivo , using rabbits as animal models, the use of a commercial product from BC (Bionext ® ) as a dressing to prevent scarring tissue formation, following tracheal stenosis surgery. Bionext dressings were observed not to induce acute inflammatory response, up to 180 days following scarification.…”
Section: Inflammatory Responsementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Panerari et al [117] used BC dressings for treatment of laryngotracheal scarification in rabbit with absence of chronic inflammatory reaction and effective healing. Additionally, BC also has been used as graft for laryngeal medicalization in the rabbit, not promoting a significant foreign-body reaction in comparison to the control group, thyroid cartilage [118].…”
Section: Scaffoldmentioning
confidence: 99%