2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2013.06.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Trace organic solutes in closed-loop forward osmosis applications: Influence of membrane fouling and modeling of solute build-up

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
47
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 92 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
3
47
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, process modeling of FO pretreatment for seawater RO desalination indicates that boron removal could be achieved more energy-efficiently with an FO-RO system than a conventional two-pass RO process [119]. While the FO-RO system shows promise for TrOC and boron removal, different rejection rates for TrOCs or boron in the FO and RO processes may result in their accumulation in the draw solution of a closed-loop FO-RO system and may potentially degrade product water quality [119,120]. Adsorption by activated carbon, ultraviolet light oxidation [27], and draw solution bleeding [119] have been suggested as mechanisms to mitigate contaminant accumulation in the closed-loop draw solution.…”
Section: Fo Pretreatment Can Improve the Permeate Quality Produced Bymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, process modeling of FO pretreatment for seawater RO desalination indicates that boron removal could be achieved more energy-efficiently with an FO-RO system than a conventional two-pass RO process [119]. While the FO-RO system shows promise for TrOC and boron removal, different rejection rates for TrOCs or boron in the FO and RO processes may result in their accumulation in the draw solution of a closed-loop FO-RO system and may potentially degrade product water quality [119,120]. Adsorption by activated carbon, ultraviolet light oxidation [27], and draw solution bleeding [119] have been suggested as mechanisms to mitigate contaminant accumulation in the closed-loop draw solution.…”
Section: Fo Pretreatment Can Improve the Permeate Quality Produced Bymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6 L); and ∆V is the permeate volume passed through the FO membrane between time t and t+∆t. It is noteworthy that TrOCs that permeated through the FO but not the RO membrane can accumulate in the draw solution [26]. Thus, C * Draw is determined from the mass balance:…”
Section: Water Quality Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The fouling mechanisms in FO systems may be different from those in pressure-driven membrane processes such as nanofiltration (NF) or RO [23][24][25]. A distinct difference in mass transport in osmosis-driven membrane processes, compared to pressure-driven membrane processes, is the occurrence of internal concentration polarisation (ICP), which occurs in the membrane porous layer [26].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%