2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.eswa.2008.01.034
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

TQM consultant selection in SMEs with TOPSIS under fuzzy environment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
60
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 129 publications
(71 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
60
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…TOPSIS has deemed one of the major decision making techniques. In recent years, TOPSIS has been effectively applied to the areas of human resources management [13], transportation [5], product design [14], manufacturing [15], water management [16], quality control [4], military [2], tourism [17] and location analysis [18]. In addition, the concept of TOPSIS has also been connected to multi-objective decision making and group decision making.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…TOPSIS has deemed one of the major decision making techniques. In recent years, TOPSIS has been effectively applied to the areas of human resources management [13], transportation [5], product design [14], manufacturing [15], water management [16], quality control [4], military [2], tourism [17] and location analysis [18]. In addition, the concept of TOPSIS has also been connected to multi-objective decision making and group decision making.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, regarding the criteria, the decision-maker's knowledge was not usually enough to choose them. It is worth highlighting in this study that Saremi et al (2009) report that the five selection criteria were determined by the council, without showing any scientific basis or supporting standard for this. This also occurs with Kabir & Sumi (2014), the study is intended for total quality management consultant selection through integrating two multicriteria methods.…”
Section: Criteriamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The criteria can have, in a specific problem, a maximization or minimization (Gomes & Gomes, 2012) There are few applications of Multiple-criteria decision-making (MCDM) in total quality management (TQM) problems and contínuos improvement in the literature, especially in relation to consultancy services and quality certification. For instance, selecting technologies that will support the aims of strategic total quality management (Madu et al, 1996); Ranking of critical factors for TQM implementation in Shanghai manufacturing industry (Chin et al, 2002); Preference-ranking model for a quality evaluation of hospital web sites (Bilsel et al, 2006); decision process for selecting external consultant in TQM program in small and medium companys (Saremi et al, 2009); Selection of lean manufacturing systems (Gurumurthy & Kodali, 2008); Selecting improvement initiatives and quality management (QM) approaches in three companies in Thailand (Thawesaengskulthai, 2010); Quality Function Deployment (QFD) combined with decision support system (Andronikidis et al, 2009); Measuring quality service combined with multicriteria method (Jerônimo & Medeiros, 2014); Evaluation of retail service quality (Sreekumar & Satpathy, 2015). Saremi et al (2009) in their study entitled "A systematic decision process for selecting external consultant in TQM program" build a decision model for consultancy selection.…”
Section: Criteriamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Generally, human judgments on performance of any model may vary from individuals to individuals due to their naturally uncertain and "ambiguous" perceptions [23]. To help and overcome the vagueness in the judgments, Zadeh [24] pioneered and proposed the classical Fuzzy Set Theory (FST) and it provides the mathematical proficiency to resolve the uncertainties by setting reliable membership functions.…”
Section: Fuzzy Sets and Fuzzy Numbersmentioning
confidence: 99%