2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.reprotox.2004.10.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Toxicological effects of acrylamide on rat testicular gene expression profile

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

8
57
2

Year Published

2007
2007
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 74 publications
(69 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
8
57
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, Yang et al (6) proved that level of testosterone hormone in rats was severely affected in different doses of acrylamide and this led to the spermatogenic effects and decreased the Leydig cell viability. Also, Hamdy et al (7) indicated that testis is a target organ of acrylamide action as it caused severe damage in seminiferous tubules and caused decrease in plasma free and total testosterone in a dose dependent manner.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, Yang et al (6) proved that level of testosterone hormone in rats was severely affected in different doses of acrylamide and this led to the spermatogenic effects and decreased the Leydig cell viability. Also, Hamdy et al (7) indicated that testis is a target organ of acrylamide action as it caused severe damage in seminiferous tubules and caused decrease in plasma free and total testosterone in a dose dependent manner.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ACR-induced histopathological lesions, such as formation of multinucleated giant cells and vacuolation, and numerous apoptotic cells were observed in seminiferous tubules. Serum testosterone level and Leydig cell viability were also decreased dose-dependently, which resulted in decreased spermatogenesis (Yang et al 2005). Although not active in the in vitro Ames test, ACR does elicit mutagenic effects in stem cell spermatogonia (Dearfield et al 1995).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To assess the genotoxicity, five animals from each treatment were killed after 2 weeks and another five animals within each treatment were killed after 8 weeks. The dose of Direct Violet (1000 ppm kg −1 day −1 ) was chosen according to NTPTRS (1994), while the dose of acrylamide (30 mg kg −1 day −1 ) was chosen according to Yang et al (2005).…”
Section: Animalsmentioning
confidence: 99%