2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.toxlet.2011.11.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Toxicity of silver nanoparticles—Nanoparticle or silver ion?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

14
400
3
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 681 publications
(437 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
14
400
3
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, as nanoparticles internalization and accumulation inside the cells depend primarily on the incubation time with nanoparticles as stated by Trono et al [26], the significant reduction of viability in cells exposed to AgNSs up to 10 minutes (63.3%) is likely due to possible action of silver nanoparticles and produced ions on the outer cellular membrane of RAW cells and not because of the possible AgNPs inside cells in this short term periods. This scenario supported by Beer et al [27] who returned the toxic effect of AgNPs to the released ion mainly than cellular internalization. In contrast, the nanogold did not induce any toxicity upto the first hour of incubation with RAW cells and only induced slight reduction of the cellular viability after long term exposure up to 24 and 48 h. Further research investigations are needed to monitor the real time uptake of macrophages to different nanoparticles and detect the time and site of localization of the …”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 54%
“…Moreover, as nanoparticles internalization and accumulation inside the cells depend primarily on the incubation time with nanoparticles as stated by Trono et al [26], the significant reduction of viability in cells exposed to AgNSs up to 10 minutes (63.3%) is likely due to possible action of silver nanoparticles and produced ions on the outer cellular membrane of RAW cells and not because of the possible AgNPs inside cells in this short term periods. This scenario supported by Beer et al [27] who returned the toxic effect of AgNPs to the released ion mainly than cellular internalization. In contrast, the nanogold did not induce any toxicity upto the first hour of incubation with RAW cells and only induced slight reduction of the cellular viability after long term exposure up to 24 and 48 h. Further research investigations are needed to monitor the real time uptake of macrophages to different nanoparticles and detect the time and site of localization of the …”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 54%
“…Fabrega et al (2012) also observed its negative influence on the growth and reproduction of the amphipod Corophium volutator. The activity of dissolved ions from NPs is reported as one of the main reasons responsible for the toxic effects of NPs (Adams et al 2006;Beer et al 2012;Yang et al 2012). Our study revealed a general trend showing that the mortality of H. incongruens is associated with the concentration of Zn in the aqueous solution of both ZnO-containing sediments (Figs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 52%
“…Human exposure to Ag is growing as the availability of Ag NPs containing products continuously expands. Recent studies have suggested that both Ag NPs and Ag ions can induce cytotoxicity through different mechanism [2][3][4]. Additionally, numerous studies have suggested that Ag NPs are prone to oxidation and can release Ag ions to the surrounding environment, and that reverse formation to NPs from Ag ions is also a possibility [5][6][7][8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%