2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.tox.2004.03.026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Toxicity of nutritionally available selenium compounds in primary and transformed hepatocytes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
26
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
1
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous studies have suggested that high doses of sodium selenite were able to induce apoptosis in primary hepatocytes and normal keratinocytes [20,21]. Our study shows that apoptotic splenocytes increase with increasing the Se content of the feed.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 65%
“…Previous studies have suggested that high doses of sodium selenite were able to induce apoptosis in primary hepatocytes and normal keratinocytes [20,21]. Our study shows that apoptotic splenocytes increase with increasing the Se content of the feed.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 65%
“…A great variability of results were reported on the SeMet dose necessary to elicit toxicity in cultured cells, with IC 50 values ranging from a few μm to tenths of mm, depending on the cell type, culture conditions and type of assay (129,130). Such a disparity may be partly explained by the strong inverse dependency of SeMet toxicity on the methionine concentration in the growth medium of yeast or mammalian cell cultures (113,131).…”
Section: Selenomethionine Toxicitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[89][90][91][92] Indeed, the cytotoxic effects of both inorganic and organic Se compounds were more potent in normal hepatocytes as compared with hepatic carcinoma cells, and nontumorigenic prostate cells are highly sensitive to Se toxicity as compared with prostate cancer cells at physiologically relevant concentrations. 93,94 For Se-induced cytotoxicity to be able to operate as a chemopreventive mechanism, Se toxicity would appear to be unavoidable. Therefore, Se-dependent selenoproteins and Se-induced phase II enzyme mechanisms, which are not associated with evoked toxicity, become more attractive to explain the cancerpreventive effects of Se, whereas the "enhanced cytotoxicity" mechanism ought to be limited to Se-sensitive cancer cells whose proliferation can be effectively suppressed by Se at safe doses.…”
Section: Se-mediated Cytotoxicity and Cancer Preventionmentioning
confidence: 99%