2021
DOI: 10.18522/2070-1403-2021-86-3-165-172
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Toxic discourse, language ecology and slang

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…What most authors agree on is that toxicity is perceived as an effect of discursive violence. For instance, Redkozubova (2023) views toxicity as the capacity to inflict harm through discourse, while other works consider it as a disruptive discourse with detrimental effects, such as conversation derailment (Saveski et al, 2021) or the spread of violence (Massanari, 2015). All of these authors have in common the idea that toxicity is something that goes with violent discourses, and which causes something.…”
Section: Toxic Discourses: Toward a Conceptmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…What most authors agree on is that toxicity is perceived as an effect of discursive violence. For instance, Redkozubova (2023) views toxicity as the capacity to inflict harm through discourse, while other works consider it as a disruptive discourse with detrimental effects, such as conversation derailment (Saveski et al, 2021) or the spread of violence (Massanari, 2015). All of these authors have in common the idea that toxicity is something that goes with violent discourses, and which causes something.…”
Section: Toxic Discourses: Toward a Conceptmentioning
confidence: 99%