Towards trustworthy end-to-end communication in industry 4.0

Bicaku, Ani; Maksuti, Silia; Palkovits-Rauter, Silke; Tauber, Markus; Matischek, Rainer; Schmittner, Christoph; Μαντάς, Γεώργιος; Thron, Mario; Delsing, Jerker

doi:10.1109/indin.2017.8104889

Cited by 18 publications

(11 citation statements)

References 13 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The identification of the standards is done based on a set of requirements provided in a research project by industrial partners in support of a secured IIoT use case, described in our previous work. 45…”

Section: Metric Modelmentioning

confidence: 99%

Security standard compliance and continuous verification for Industrial Internet of Things

Bicaku

Tauber

Delsing

2020

International Journal of Distributed Sensor Networks

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Due to globalization and digitalization of industrial systems, standard compliance is gaining more attention. In order to stay competitive and remain in business, different sectors within industry are required to comply with multiple regulations. Compliance aims to fulfill regulations by including all measures imposed by laws and standards. Every device, application, or service implements several technologies at many levels, and standards support interoperability across them. They help to create global markets for industries and enable networked development in order to be successful and sustainable. This work highlights the importance of standard compliance and continuous verification in industrial Internet of Things and implements an automatic monitoring and standard compliance verification framework. In this work, we focus on security, safety, and organizational aspects of industrial Internet of Things. We identify a number of standards and best practice guidelines, which are used to extract security, safety, and organizational measurable indicator points. In addition, a metric model is provided that forms the basis for the necessary information needed for compliance verification, including requirements, standards, and metrics. Also, we present the prototype of the monitoring and standard compliance verification framework used to show the security compliance of an industrial Internet of Things use case.

show abstract

Section: Metric Modelmentioning

confidence: 99%

Security standard compliance and continuous verification for Industrial Internet of Things

Bicaku

Tauber

Delsing

2020

International Journal of Distributed Sensor Networks

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Engineering Industry for Industry 4.0 Industry 4.0 warrants physical resources in terms of IoT, CPS, Additive manufacturing, etc [49]. Similarly, there is a need for software resources such as machine learning algorithms, ERP software's, etc [50].…”

Section: Top Management Support and Leadership In Indianmentioning

confidence: 99%

Developing an Industry 4.0 Readiness Model for Indian Engineering Industries

Sony

Aithal

2020

IJMTS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

For India to be a global economic superpower, the Indian Engineering Industry which at present is the largest foreign exchange earner must make its strong presence in the global markets. Industry 4.0 is one such initiative which has the power to transform the Indian Engineering Industry to be globally competitive along several strategic dimensions. Industry 4.0 is gradually making inroads and yet, there is no model to assess whether the Indian Engineering Industry is prepared to implement Industry 4.0. This study develops a multi-dimensional Industry4.0 readiness model by analysing in-depth the extant literature. A theoretical framework for assessment is developed. Further, the developed model is qualitatively analysed using the ABCD framework. Practical application of Industry 4.0 readiness model in Indian Engineering Industries is discussed. This is the first Industry 4.0 readiness model developed for Indian Engineering Industries.

show abstract

“…There is also some initiatives and solutions to deal with trustworthy interoperability in Industry 4.0, including trust end-to-end communication protocol for Cyber-Physical Production Systems (CPPS) (Bicaku et al, 2017), trust access control (KJERSGAARD; ERIKSENA; HARLAMOVA, 2018; KJERSGAARD; ERIKSENA, 2018), trustworthy communication among gateways and physical devices (Fraile et al, 2018), middleware solution based on blockchain to promote trust in the integration of resources and services Al-Jaroodi, 2019), and solutions related to trustworthy contracts to support privacy and security (AL-ALI et al, 2018b). Although these and other many punctual solutions can promote trust in the interoperability in Industry 4.0, covering only some aspects is not enough for companies to avoid disruptions and breaches in the production lines (AL-ALI et al, 2018b; Bicaku et al, 2017; KJERSGAARD; ERIKSENA; HARLAMOVA, 2018) and, therefore, a set of complementary aspects should be jointly considered.…”

Section: Contextmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…In the strongly dynamic context of Industry 4.0, the increasing automation and geographically distributed industrial ecosystems are raising concerns related to trustworthy interoperability of data, things, and services undertaken by fine-grained (humans, machines, robots, sensors) to coarse-grained decentralized entities (enterprises, business). This infrastructure relies on many intermediaries, which increases the risk of non-authorized access to data and intrusions in the production process, affecting different areas, such as modification of operation process, interruption in the manufacturing process, sabotage and manipulation of data and services causing injury or even loss of life (Bicaku et al, 2017).…”

Section: Problem and Motivationmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Current solutions are focused on specific concerns related to trust, such as security and privacy of data (Bicaku et al, 2017; KJERSGAARD; ERIKSENA; HARLAMOVA, 2018; KJER-SGAARD; ERIKSENA, 2018; Fraile et al, 2018; AL-ALI et al, 2018b), but the trust gap in current solution is exponentially expanding unnecessary burden to always trust in intermediaries to control data. At the same time, blockchain has been widely considered as new promising technology to solve trust concerns in the interoperability of systems by mainly reducing or avoiding the need for intermediaries (Christidis;Devetsikiotis, 2016;Wang et al, 2018).…”

Section: Problem and Motivationmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

A Trustworthy Interoperability Architecture for Industry 4.0

Allian¹

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This thesis is not only the result of the last five years of work, but yes was a consequence of cumulative learning, experiences, and collaborations, on both personal and professional levels. I remember a friend when I was 12 years old. He asked me what I would like to be in the future. At that time I had no idea and replied that I would like to be a successful person. He asked me -"are there many successful people in your family?" -I answered -"As far as I know, no". He said -"So, be the first one!". His words made me realize I had a long journey ahead. I am glad I have met many extraordinary people who guided me to be who I am now. So, I am thankful to all those wonderful people who were and still are part of my life. I thank God for guiding me and giving me strength and hope through all these years. I thank my family, my mom Odete, my brothers Ju and Gui for being supportive and giving words of strength. I thank all my school friends, who gave me the first words of motivation, and all the other colleagues from school and from university who made part of my academic growth. Special thanks go to my great friends from USP Bruno, Pedro, Leo, Dió, MLydia, and many other great friends from LABES, who I will never forget. I thank all my professors from primary and high school who helped me shape who I am. I thank the professors from my bachelor's, master's, and doctorate degrees, who showed me the tools for me to start learning by myself. I am deeply grateful to Prof. Elisa for all the "good tanoshimis". For believing in me and accepting to oriented me during this journey. For being a person who has brought many possibilities in my life. Thank you so much for the great moments shared and for the good vibes! I thank all professionals and friends from Fraunhofer, in special Dr.

show abstract

Towards trustworthy end-to-end communication in industry 4.0

Cited by 18 publications

References 13 publications

Security standard compliance and continuous verification for Industrial Internet of Things

Security standard compliance and continuous verification for Industrial Internet of Things

Developing an Industry 4.0 Readiness Model for Indian Engineering Industries

A Trustworthy Interoperability Architecture for Industry 4.0

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About