2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.polar.2016.06.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Towards transdisciplinarity in Arctic sustainability knowledge co-production: Socially-Oriented Observations as a participatory integrated activity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This approach has gained considerable att ention and use in the Canadian North (Finnegan & Coates, 2015;Petrov et al, 2015). Although not without limitations (e.g., Ozkan & Schott , 2013), the main advantage of the ASI framework is its inclusiveness of various Arctic-specifi c domains, coupled with the relative simplicity of ASI indicators and their reliance on existing data (Larsen & Petrov, 2015;Vlasova & Volkov, 2016). The framework also provides linkages with the measurements of socio-economic impacts, benefi t sharing, and "sustainability" with respect to resource development projects (Petrov et al, 2018;McGrath-Horn, 2017).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This approach has gained considerable att ention and use in the Canadian North (Finnegan & Coates, 2015;Petrov et al, 2015). Although not without limitations (e.g., Ozkan & Schott , 2013), the main advantage of the ASI framework is its inclusiveness of various Arctic-specifi c domains, coupled with the relative simplicity of ASI indicators and their reliance on existing data (Larsen & Petrov, 2015;Vlasova & Volkov, 2016). The framework also provides linkages with the measurements of socio-economic impacts, benefi t sharing, and "sustainability" with respect to resource development projects (Petrov et al, 2018;McGrath-Horn, 2017).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Socially Oriented Observations in the Arctic is another step toward the involvement of traditional knowledge of local communities in the regional ecosystem markets, with the main objectives being to increase the knowledge and long-term observation of rapid changes in life quality, including the state of the natural environment (climate, biodiversity, etc. ), and social, economic, cultural, and legal conditions [16].…”
Section: Role Of Local Communities In Ecosystem Service Maintenancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, the sustainable development of the Arctic means a controlled eco-social evolution toward conservative nature use, comprehensive adaptation to climate change, and a minimization of negative anthropogenic impacts on the Arctic's natural ecosystems. The challenges to Arctic sustainable development are interrelated and multi-scaled in space and time [16]; the introduction of an ecosystem market is a promising pathway for achieving consensus between global, national, and local SD goals. Arctic Resilience is understood as a property of a system that provides the underlying capacity for navigating social-ecological change, whether by adapting to it or by embracing fundamental, transformative changes [15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Problems on providing sustainability, sustainable development, and food security of indigenous and local residents of the North and the Arctic, especially in the last 15-20 years, attract the attention of many scientists, both from the countries of the Arctic Council and other countries [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%