2019
DOI: 10.1002/sat.1331
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Towards the implementation of advanced random access schemes for satellite IoT

Abstract: Summary Machine‐to‐machine (M2M) communications being pivotal for internet of things (IoT) networks are characterized by low‐cost, low complexity, and often energy constrained terminals with low traffic duty cycle. Satellite networks provide an attractive low‐cost solution for such application, in particular when the terminals (both fixed and mobile) are distributed over a wide geographical area not well served by terrestrial infrastructure. An ALOHA random access (RA) scheme is a natural candidate for M2M com… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In case an acknowledgment (ACK) is not received from the network, the device goes to sleep and tries again to retransmit the same packet after a random time. Despite being a simple protocol and performing well at very modest traffic, the increased propagation delay in the satellite channel creates potential network stability issues, making it an unattractive solution for modern IoT satellite applications [232]. In the last decade, there has been an effort in investigating more advanced RA schemes for satellite IoT and a survey can be found in [233].…”
Section: B Mac Protocols For Satellite Iotmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In case an acknowledgment (ACK) is not received from the network, the device goes to sleep and tries again to retransmit the same packet after a random time. Despite being a simple protocol and performing well at very modest traffic, the increased propagation delay in the satellite channel creates potential network stability issues, making it an unattractive solution for modern IoT satellite applications [232]. In the last decade, there has been an effort in investigating more advanced RA schemes for satellite IoT and a survey can be found in [233].…”
Section: B Mac Protocols For Satellite Iotmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The above mentioned best-performing techniques adopt iterative successive interference cancellation to increase the detection probability of the received packets. The authors in [232] further investigate the performance of single-frequency and multifrequency CRDSA and ACRDA [238] under realistic parameters and for a number of system scenarios of practical interest. In [239] the phase noise impact on the performance of CRDSA is analyzed.…”
Section: B Mac Protocols For Satellite Iotmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We depict in Fig. 4 ASE (21) versus the traffic load α for a number of cases following the same structure in Section III.…”
Section: ) Asymptotic Spectral Efficiencymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Remarkably, both protocols have in common the adoption of IC schemes whose decoding performance is improved substantially under packet-power unbalance. They have been duly adopted in numerous settings due to their high performance and complexity-constrained operation [18]- [21]. Thus, the investigation of the best power unbalance required by the iterative receiver deserves special attention.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%