Towards the Design of a Multispar Composite Wing

Abstract

In the pursuit of a lighter composite wing design, fast and effective methodologies for sizing and validating the wing members (e.g., spar, ribs, skins, etc.) are required. In the present paper, the preliminary design methodology of an airliner main composite wing, which has an innovative multispar configuration instead of the conventional two-spar design, is investigated. The investigated aircraft wing is a large-scale composite component, requiring an efficient analysis methodology; for this purpose, the initial wing sizing is mostly based on simplified Finite Element (FE) stress analysis combined to analytically formulated design criteria. The proposed methodology comprises three basic modules, namely, computational stress analysis of the wing structure, comparison of the stress–strain results to specific design allowable and a suitable resizing procedure, until all design requirements are satisfied. The design constraints include strain allowable for the entire wing structure, stability constraints for the upper skin and spar webs, as well as bearing bypass analysis of the riveted/bolted joints of the spar flanges/skins connection. A comparison between a conventional (2-spar) and an innovative 4-spar wing configuration is presented. It arises from the comparison between the conventional and the 4-spar wing arrangement, that under certain conditions the multispar configuration has significant advantages over the conventional design.

Design and Development of Unibody Quadcopter Structure Using Optimization and Additive Manufacturing Techniques

“…This method helps to cut down the component weight by eliminating the unwanted material based on the objective function and specified constraints. Owing to its high geometrical design freedom, this method is particularly suited for aerospace applications [28,29]. The major difference between the shape and topology optimization is that the topology optimization will work on reduction of weight by optimally distributing the weight whereas the shape optimization will work around the known geometries [30,31].…”

Buckling Analysis of Laminated Stiffened Plates with Material Anisotropy Using the Rayleigh–Ritz Approach

“…Currently, the buckling solution for anisotropic stiffened plates is mainly obtained by either performing numerical analysis, usually using the finite element method (FEM), or by considering empirically suitable correction factors for the unstiffened plate solutions. However, during the preliminary design of large-scale stiffened anisotropic structures (e.g., a wing structure) many optimization loops to optimize the structure with respect to buckling resistance are required, [26]. In such cases, where a high number of iteration solutions are required before the optimal geometry is defined, the convergence time is critical.…”