2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2021.106396
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Towards ternary binders involving limestone additions — A review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
45
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 167 publications
(61 citation statements)
references
References 235 publications
2
45
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, the incorporation of limestone in ternary binders (FL and SL series) generally reduced the mechanical performance of the mortars, compared to the rest of binders with slag and/or fly ash (S, F, and SF series). These results were also coincident with most of those already described, showing the effects of this non-active addition [ 21 , 65 ]. Lastly, it is interesting to highlight the similar or even better flexural and compressive strengths observed at 250 days for most of the binders with at least one active addition (slag and/or fly ash) in comparison with reference mortars.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…In addition, the incorporation of limestone in ternary binders (FL and SL series) generally reduced the mechanical performance of the mortars, compared to the rest of binders with slag and/or fly ash (S, F, and SF series). These results were also coincident with most of those already described, showing the effects of this non-active addition [ 21 , 65 ]. Lastly, it is interesting to highlight the similar or even better flexural and compressive strengths observed at 250 days for most of the binders with at least one active addition (slag and/or fly ash) in comparison with reference mortars.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Finally, the limestone addition produced a reduction in electrical resistivity when it was incorporated into the binder, as showed the comparison between mortars with slag (SL series had lower resistivity compared to S and SF series) and between those with fly ash (FL series had lower resistivity in comparison with SF and F series). This would be in accordance with pore size distributions, being in relation to the only filler effect of limestone [ 21 , 65 ], without hydraulic or pozzolanic activity, previously discussed.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
See 3 more Smart Citations