Towards New Disaster Governance: Subsidiarity as a Critical Tool

Abstract

Major natural disasters are events where day‐to‐day governance activities are disrupted and a large range of different actors – governmental and non‐governmental – are required to (re)act. Given the inherently chaotic nature of disaster events, and the diverse groups responding to their attendant impacts, clarity about how authority and responsibility are allocated across key disaster management actors is essential. This raises numerous pertinent questions: Are there areas of shared competence between different disaster management actors? Is there a need for them to act in common? Is credible cooperation feasible? Can responsibilities be allocated in a clear and effective manner? In this paper, drawing upon the subsidiarity principle, we provide a review of the academic literature using the role of different actors in disaster management in Australia as the case. The objective of the paper is to synthesise what is known and to, thereby, provoke greater conversation and research of responsibilities during disaster events in Australia and beyond. The ultimate contribution is to help understand how the roles of different disaster management actors can be better reconciled to ensure more effective and efficient outcomes. Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd and ERP Environment

Global Water Governance and Climate Change: Identifying Innovative Arrangements for Adaptive Transformation

“…This discussion on democratised performance has aided in the mapping and understanding of who participates where and when independently of the prescribed roles [59]. This, for a long time has been the focus of governance studies [60] and multiple categories have been created to explain them [61,62].…”

“…This, therefore, is an understanding of democratisation in its broadest and pluralist sense: that relevant actors are able to realise their potential within a complex system. This is not a criterion that advocates for the suppression or promotion of hierarchies, but one that understands the differences in the position of actors in the field (the arena where the dilemma is taking place) and how this determines their responsibilities [59].…”

“…In the context of water, recent geographical scholarship has used the notion of the 'hydrosocial cycle' to highlight how water is moderated by social, political, economic, and cultural relations and that these relations are, in turn, influenced by the materiality and physicality of water [59,95,[104][105][106][107]. Siloed understandings of the non-human world have influenced our managerial practices [108,109].…”

Decentralisation and drought adaptation: Applying the subsidiarity principle in transboundary river basins

“…Periodic deficits in precipitation, runoff or soil moisture lead to a 'temporary lack of water' in relation to longterm averages, but droughts are also socially constructed according to humanly defined thresholds and vulnerabilities (Kallis 2008). Droughts and other hazards disrupt 'day-to-day governance activities' (Melo Zurita et al 2015), which tests institutional arrangements for allocating and managing scarce water resources. Confusion about roles and responsibilities creates conditions ripe for opportunistic behaviour by individuals, governments and civil society who attempt to shirk or seize responsibility (Garrick et al 2016).…”

A Conceptual Governance Framework for Climate Change Adaptation and Disaster Risk Reduction Integration

“…Increasingly NGO are reconsidering their attitude towards government financial support out of concern that they may become too reliant on contracts and grants with state actors (Melo Zurita et al 2015). This may be a costeffective approach for state actors, but it can also represent a strategic form of increased state control of previously independent actors.…”