2016 4th International Conference on User Science and Engineering (I-USEr) 2016
DOI: 10.1109/iuser.2016.7857945
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Towards MOOC for technical courses: A blended learning empirical analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
8
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, contrary to the study done by Roshchina, Roshchin and Rudakov [8], students with different academic performance all liked MOOCs and it was not similar to their study where only high performing students liked it. Unlike the study done by Fesol and Salam [4] where preconceptions towards MOOCs remained the same after being exposed to it, as students who were predisposed towards traditional learning were more against MOOCs and students who were more predisposed towards flexible online learning were positive towards MOOCs, in this study, majority of students regardless of their predispositions towards online learning or traditional learning, became positive after a trying with it. The findings of this paper imply that pleasure see [24] in learning was a factor turning students' views towards MOOCs in a positive direction as the traditional learning in the country of Saudi Arabia is quite rigid see [20].…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Moreover, contrary to the study done by Roshchina, Roshchin and Rudakov [8], students with different academic performance all liked MOOCs and it was not similar to their study where only high performing students liked it. Unlike the study done by Fesol and Salam [4] where preconceptions towards MOOCs remained the same after being exposed to it, as students who were predisposed towards traditional learning were more against MOOCs and students who were more predisposed towards flexible online learning were positive towards MOOCs, in this study, majority of students regardless of their predispositions towards online learning or traditional learning, became positive after a trying with it. The findings of this paper imply that pleasure see [24] in learning was a factor turning students' views towards MOOCs in a positive direction as the traditional learning in the country of Saudi Arabia is quite rigid see [20].…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 83%
“…When it comes to Hybrid MOOCs, there is a general consensus that students approve of this method of teaching. Fesol and Salam [4] discovered six categories regarding student perceptions towards Hybrid MOOCs within higher education. These six aspects are student beliefs towards web learning, study management, learning flexibility, technology usage, interaction on the internet, and learning within classrooms.…”
Section: Student Attitudes Towards Hybrid Moocsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Investigating BL in teaching context is a meaningful issue of enquiry (Dakduk et al, 2018;Edward et al, 2018;Makri et al, 2014;Wong et al, 2018). According to Owston et al (2008a); Fesol and Salam (2016) there is need for a model that provides an extensive guideline on the factors required for lecturers to design BL pedagogy course content to improve teaching and learning activities. Despite the significant role of lecturers towards the success of BL adoption in institutions only fewer studies (Owston et al, 2008b;Wong et al, 2014;Alhabeeba and Rowley, 2018;Bervell & Umar, 2018;Ghazal et al, 2018) have investigated factors that influence lecturer's adoption of BL to improve teaching quality.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is due to the limited research of institutional adoption that focuses on advocacy, and other reasons might be proficiency, funding, reputation as the answers of why this kind of topic rarely investigated (Smith & Hill, 2019). Consequently, blended learning policies need to be developed by institutions that provide extensive guidance to initiate and disseminate BL approaches for academic activities (Fesol & Salam, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%