2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.anucene.2015.06.040
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Towards modeling and validation enhancements of the PSI MCNPX fast neutron fluence computational scheme based on recent PWR experimental data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It can be noted that typically the C/E-1 values observed from the relevant validation studies in the dosimetry domain fall within~±20% (see e.g., [62,67,68]) and this level of accuracy is considered normally as acceptable [1,60]. In more details, only a rather general and approximate assessment could be given here for demonstration purpose, based e.g., on the results published in [62,68]: for the 93 Nb fluence monitor the average (C/E-1) values obtained with the PWR-GP, PWR-ST and BWR-D validation models (with ENDF/B-VII.0 in [62] and ENDF/B-VII.1 in [68] as the base ND and CM library) were respectively~5%,~5% and~18%.…”
Section: General Description and Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…It can be noted that typically the C/E-1 values observed from the relevant validation studies in the dosimetry domain fall within~±20% (see e.g., [62,67,68]) and this level of accuracy is considered normally as acceptable [1,60]. In more details, only a rather general and approximate assessment could be given here for demonstration purpose, based e.g., on the results published in [62,68]: for the 93 Nb fluence monitor the average (C/E-1) values obtained with the PWR-GP, PWR-ST and BWR-D validation models (with ENDF/B-VII.0 in [62] and ENDF/B-VII.1 in [68] as the base ND and CM library) were respectively~5%,~5% and~18%.…”
Section: General Description and Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In more details, only a rather general and approximate assessment could be given here for demonstration purpose, based e.g., on the results published in [62,68]: for the 93 Nb fluence monitor the average (C/E-1) values obtained with the PWR-GP, PWR-ST and BWR-D validation models (with ENDF/B-VII.0 in [62] and ENDF/B-VII.1 in [68] as the base ND and CM library) were respectively~5%,~5% and~18%. For the same models and the 54 Fe fluence monitors the (C/E-1) values were~−1%,~3% and~9%.…”
Section: General Description and Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The original purpose of the program is to measure the neutron transport through materials typical for "heavy reflectors" as found, for example, in the EPR reactor design and thus to provide validation data for the selected materials cross-sections and reflector properties. However, the PETALE setup can also be useful for providing experimental data applicable for validation of calculation methodologies for typical LWR reactor dosimetry applications, like the one being developed and validated at PSI [1], [2], [3]. Thus, a pertinent question which can * e-mail: alexander.vasiliev@psi.ch be posed is: how representative are the planned PETALE measurements for the validation of FNF predictions in LWR structures?…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%