2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.scs.2017.04.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Towards environmental sustainability adoption in construction firms: An empirical analysis of market orientation and organizational innovativeness impacts

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

7
29
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 72 publications
7
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…If a firm is considered to be high market orientation, this leads greater inter-organizational learning, which in turn increases the firm competitive advantage. This result support from the previous work by providing an argument that inter-organizational learning is essential to explain the relationship between market orientation and firm competitive advantage (Najafi-Tavani et al , 2016) through supporting the product development to meet the customers’ demands (Bamgbade et al , 2017).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…If a firm is considered to be high market orientation, this leads greater inter-organizational learning, which in turn increases the firm competitive advantage. This result support from the previous work by providing an argument that inter-organizational learning is essential to explain the relationship between market orientation and firm competitive advantage (Najafi-Tavani et al , 2016) through supporting the product development to meet the customers’ demands (Bamgbade et al , 2017).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Innovative processes in construction firms have been regarded as a way of optimizing material and energy (Bamgbade et al. ). Therefore, from the organizational perspective, a technical and management approach could be to promote innovation and research of alternatives that imply less demand for petroleum products.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The former is associated with adopting technologies in products, services, and processes to improve environmental performance. In contrast, management innovation involves changes in a firm's internal structure, such as the use of Environmental Management System (EMS) (Cheng, Yang and Sheu, 2014), partnering and supply chains (Fernando and Wah, 2017;Ozorhon and Oral, 2017), improved human resources development (Cainelli, De Marchi and Grandinetti, 2015), and new policies, procedures and organisational approaches (Bamgbade, Kamaruddeen and Nawi, 2017) that stimulate the importance of environmental considerations. EI adoption utilises technology and management to produce new products and processes that positively impact the environment (Lim and Peltner, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The eco-innovative process has been suggested as the way forward to merge innovation and environmental sustainability (Sanni, 2017;Reid and Miedzinski, 2008. The Malaysian government and non-governmental organisations have initiated various actions to raise awareness of green practices; however, the involvement of contractor firms in adopting green and eco-innovative practices within their business operations and projects remains insufficient (Bamgbade, Kamaruddeen and Nawi, 2017;Bohari, et al, 2015). In addition, the focus on construction innovation and eco-movement concerns have the opposite effect, whereby the environmental impact is often neglected (Xue et al, 2014;Zhiwei, Chen and San, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%