2011
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-19997-4_19
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Towards Construction of Situational Methods for Service Identification

Abstract: Abstract. The service-oriented paradigm plays an increasingly significant role in designing and governing IT architectures in organizations. The identification of services belongs to the most important parts of the service management lifecycle and is essential for the successful implementation of service-oriented architectures (SOA). However, existing methods for service identification mostly ignore situation-specific factors for such projects. Situational method engineering can be used to design a meta method… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Situation factors (Harmsen, Lubbers, & Wijers, 1995) Environment: management commitment, resources; Project Method implementation: Size of project team, capability of project team Projects: Innovation level, Clarity of project goal, complexity of project Project Characteristics (Harmsen, Lubbers, & Wijers, 1995) Team size Domain Characteristics etc. Project Environment (Harmsen, 1997) Existing information infrastructure, the users, the method implementational culture of both the supplier method implementation and the customer method implementation Project Characterization based on Project or contingency factors (Harmsen, 1997) Examples of project or contingency factors are Application/ domain characteristics, external factors, technical factors, and the available development expertise Situation Factors (Harmsen, 1997) Environment: management commitment, importance of the information system, impact of the information system, amount of resistance and conflict, scarcity of available resources, stability and formality of the environment, knowledge and experience of the users Project method implementation: skill of the project team, size of the project team, quality of information planning, interfaces with other projects and systems, dependency on other projects and parties Project: clarity and stability of project goal, quality of the specifications, size of the (Börner, Goeken, Kohlborn, & Korthaus, 2011) After (Börner, 2010) Compliance: general laws, industry-specific, regulations, internal policies IT department: existent, not existent Interaction: customer interaction, employee interaction our notion of functional method, introduce the functional method meta-model and postulate the attributes of a functional situation. The operations required to perform matching with the functional situation are also considered.…”
Section: Situation Characterization Based On Examplementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Situation factors (Harmsen, Lubbers, & Wijers, 1995) Environment: management commitment, resources; Project Method implementation: Size of project team, capability of project team Projects: Innovation level, Clarity of project goal, complexity of project Project Characteristics (Harmsen, Lubbers, & Wijers, 1995) Team size Domain Characteristics etc. Project Environment (Harmsen, 1997) Existing information infrastructure, the users, the method implementational culture of both the supplier method implementation and the customer method implementation Project Characterization based on Project or contingency factors (Harmsen, 1997) Examples of project or contingency factors are Application/ domain characteristics, external factors, technical factors, and the available development expertise Situation Factors (Harmsen, 1997) Environment: management commitment, importance of the information system, impact of the information system, amount of resistance and conflict, scarcity of available resources, stability and formality of the environment, knowledge and experience of the users Project method implementation: skill of the project team, size of the project team, quality of information planning, interfaces with other projects and systems, dependency on other projects and parties Project: clarity and stability of project goal, quality of the specifications, size of the (Börner, Goeken, Kohlborn, & Korthaus, 2011) After (Börner, 2010) Compliance: general laws, industry-specific, regulations, internal policies IT department: existent, not existent Interaction: customer interaction, employee interaction our notion of functional method, introduce the functional method meta-model and postulate the attributes of a functional situation. The operations required to perform matching with the functional situation are also considered.…”
Section: Situation Characterization Based On Examplementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bucher, Klesse, Kurpjuweit, and Winter (2007) is concerned about the poor understanding of the notion of a situation. According to Börner (2010), there is need to find a way to reduce the number of possible situations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%