2009 IEEE International Conference on Services Computing 2009
DOI: 10.1109/scc.2009.59
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Towards Autonomic Service Discovery A Survey and Comparison

Abstract: Abstract-Service-oriented architecture has become the standard paradigm for software component integration. However, with the permanently increasing amount of available services and dynamic changes, the complexity of such service infrastructures, their maintenance, and consequently the expenditures spent for their operation increase equally. To deal with these effects, an improvement of service composition and discovery becomes necessary, especially a higher degree of automation. Following the idea of Autonomi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Specifically, in [51], the authors pose criteria for the evaluation of service registries and organize the discussion from two viewpoints: the viewpoint of the system and the viewpoint of humans. A more recent effort [108] emphasizes the degree of distribution of the service registry and the use of semantic information in the service matchmaking process. Further works focus on service discovery protocols for mobile ad hoc environments, which are part of the Future Internet [95,135].…”
Section: State Of the Artmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Specifically, in [51], the authors pose criteria for the evaluation of service registries and organize the discussion from two viewpoints: the viewpoint of the system and the viewpoint of humans. A more recent effort [108] emphasizes the degree of distribution of the service registry and the use of semantic information in the service matchmaking process. Further works focus on service discovery protocols for mobile ad hoc environments, which are part of the Future Internet [95,135].…”
Section: State Of the Artmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, the centralized approach does not scale well with respect to the increasing number of clients that pose service discovery queries [51,108]. Moreover, in the centralized approach, the single registry constitutes a single point of failure.…”
Section: Service Discovery Protocolmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A comprehensive survey on service discovery approaches is provided in [22], where authors define the prime criteria that need to be fulfilled for an autonomic service discovery. Analysed solutions are categorized according to: (i) its level of decentralization (i.e., centralized, distributed or decentralized), and (ii) its matchmaking reasoning level (i.e., syntactical, hybrid or semantic).…”
Section: Service Discovery For Iot Environmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Authors in [34] provide a comprehensive survey on service discovery approaches and define the prime criteria that need to be fulfilled for an autonomic service discovery. Screened solutions were categorized according to: (i) its level of decentralization (i.e., centralized, distributed or decentralized), and (ii) its matchmaking reasoning level (i.e., syntactical, hybrid or semantic).…”
Section: Service Discovery For Iot Environmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%