2010
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-16111-7_42
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Towards Automatic Manipulation Action Planning for Service Robots

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Robot software architecture SMPA architecture. Ruehl et al 6 extended the classic sense-plan-act cycle with a discretization step before planning and a verification step for generating steps in support of planning executable manipulation actions. The additional steps work together to map the real-world environments to an approximation for the symbolic planner and to check the feasibility of the generated plans to ensure high feasibility and reliability of the robot plan execution.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Robot software architecture SMPA architecture. Ruehl et al 6 extended the classic sense-plan-act cycle with a discretization step before planning and a verification step for generating steps in support of planning executable manipulation actions. The additional steps work together to map the real-world environments to an approximation for the symbolic planner and to check the feasibility of the generated plans to ensure high feasibility and reliability of the robot plan execution.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…III-A, segmentation of manipulation is necessary in order to generate useful time invariant features. In order to adapt the course of actions in a flexible manner, we use a high-level symbolic description, which is mapped in an event based manner to parameters for the impedance control [17]. Therefore, activities are decomposed into atomic actions, which have constant control parameters.…”
Section: Segmentationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[8]. [7] includes knowledge about manipulation constraints during the planning step and tries to verify them afterwards. In [8] the symbolic output is mapped to a accessibility list calculated a priori, which handles all known geometric states for the corresponding actions.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%