Volume 2: Pipeline Safety Management Systems; Project Management, Design, Construction and Environmental Issues; Strain Based D 2016
DOI: 10.1115/ipc2016-64425
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Towards an Acceptable Pipeline Integrity Target Reliability

Abstract: Integrity reliability analysis is becoming an important component of effective pipeline integrity management systems. It aims at utilizing reliability engineering to address integrity uncertainties and check pipeline reliability measures against safety objectives/targets. In current practice, pipeline safety is typically verified using simplified deterministic procedures based on a safety factor approach that is tailored to the design of new pipes. A more realistic verification of actual safety performance of … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[87] Application T A B L E 11 Reliability targets (per km per year) proposed by Nessim and colleagues. [96,97] Limit state vategory Transported product Safety class Abbreviations: LLS, leakage limit state; LVP, low vapor pressure; SLS, serviceability limit state; ULS, ultimate limit state.…”
Section: Identified Gaps and Future Recommendations In Numerical Mode...mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[87] Application T A B L E 11 Reliability targets (per km per year) proposed by Nessim and colleagues. [96,97] Limit state vategory Transported product Safety class Abbreviations: LLS, leakage limit state; LVP, low vapor pressure; SLS, serviceability limit state; ULS, ultimate limit state.…”
Section: Identified Gaps and Future Recommendations In Numerical Mode...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hassanien et al [ 96 ] proposed a strict permissible PoF of 1 × 10 −5 per segment for all integrity threats (crack, corrosion, and dents) based on the estimated probabilty of failure calculated using the failure pressures (i.e., the operature pressures recorded right before the historical rupture failures). This permissble PoF was three orders of magnitude less than the lowest evaluated PoF of segments and considers epistemic and growth mechanism uncertainties.…”
Section: Corrosion Risk Assessment Based On Probability Of Failurementioning
confidence: 99%