2011 IEEE First International Conference on Healthcare Informatics, Imaging and Systems Biology 2011
DOI: 10.1109/hisb.2011.43
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Towards Aging-in-Place: Automatic Assessment of Product Usability for Older Adults with Dementia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
1
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For the four ML models we used, the TPR ranged from 88% to 96%, and the FPR ranged from 26% to 48%. These results are similar to those of a previous study that tried to automate the assessment of product usability using artificial intelligence (TPR = 84.5%, FPR = 41.1%) 27 . In contrast, a study on breast cancer detection showed a higher TPR (>95%) and a lower FPR (<0.1%) compared with our study, 28 in which we deliberately chose a threshold to maximize the TPR while maintaining a relatively low FPR.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For the four ML models we used, the TPR ranged from 88% to 96%, and the FPR ranged from 26% to 48%. These results are similar to those of a previous study that tried to automate the assessment of product usability using artificial intelligence (TPR = 84.5%, FPR = 41.1%) 27 . In contrast, a study on breast cancer detection showed a higher TPR (>95%) and a lower FPR (<0.1%) compared with our study, 28 in which we deliberately chose a threshold to maximize the TPR while maintaining a relatively low FPR.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…These results are similar to those of a previous study that tried to automate the assessment of product usability using artificial intelligence (TPR = 84.5%, FPR = 41.1%). 27 In contrast, a study on breast cancer detection showed a higher TPR (>95%) and a lower FPR (<0.1%) compared with our study, 28 in which we deliberately chose a threshold to maximize the TPR while maintaining a relatively low FPR. However, it is important to note that our ML-based decision-assisting algorithm was designed to reduce repetitive tasks.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 80%
“…However, as these methods are resource intensive, conducting a large-scale study would be a significant undertaking. To address this, work is underway to develop computer algorithms that can autonomously capture and categorise product use, allowing large amounts of data to be analysed automatically with the goal of enabling a more holistic understanding of product use [46,47]. …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%