2020
DOI: 10.3390/en13246514
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Towards Accurate Boundary Conditions for CFD Models of Synthetic Jets in Quiescent Flow

Abstract: In this paper, an accurate model to simulate the dynamics of the flow of synthetic jets (SJ) in quiescent flow is proposed. Computational modeling is an effective approach to understand the physics involved in these devices, commonly used in active flow control for several reasons. For example, SJ actuators are small; hence, it is difficult to experimentally measure pressure changes within the cavity. Although computational modeling is an advantageous approach, experiments are still the main technique employed… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 48 publications
(47 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1a), such that the fluid in the chamber is subjected to a periodic velocity boundary condition at the jet opening (Eq. 1), accomplishing net-zero mass flux without needing to define an explicit cavity geometry (Kral et al 1997;Matiz-Chicacausa and Lopez Mejia 2020). (Notably, cavity shape, depth and internal volume are expected to significantly influence the behavior of a real experimental device (Kotapati et al 2007;Chaudhari et al 2008Chaudhari et al , 2009Jain et al 2011;Capuano et al 2019), but these considerations are beyond the scope of this study.)…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1a), such that the fluid in the chamber is subjected to a periodic velocity boundary condition at the jet opening (Eq. 1), accomplishing net-zero mass flux without needing to define an explicit cavity geometry (Kral et al 1997;Matiz-Chicacausa and Lopez Mejia 2020). (Notably, cavity shape, depth and internal volume are expected to significantly influence the behavior of a real experimental device (Kotapati et al 2007;Chaudhari et al 2008Chaudhari et al , 2009Jain et al 2011;Capuano et al 2019), but these considerations are beyond the scope of this study.)…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%