Towards a theory of interpersonal accommodation through language: some Canadian data

Abstract

The study was designed to investigate the process of speech accommodation between bilinguals from two ethnolinguistic groups. It was hypothesized that the greater the amount of effort in accommodation that a bilingual speaker of one group was perceived to put into his message, the more favourably he would be perceived by listeners from another ethnic group, and also the more effort they in turn would put into accommodating back to him. Eighty bilingual English-Canadians were divided into four groups and individually tested. 5s heard on tape a French-Canadian describe a picture and they were required to sketch this while listening. 5s were made fully aware that their speaker had a choice of language for his description. The four groups heard the same male speaker describe the drawing but each in a different guise: (1) French, (2) Mix-mix, (3) Fluent English and (4) Nonfluent English. 5s were then requested to rate their speaker and his performance, and to record a description of another picture themselves for that same French-Canadian to draw later. From analyses of the ratings and the 5s' tapes, the hypotheses were confirmed and different types of accommodation noted. A theoretical framework for these results and other forms of interpersonal accommodation was suggested. (Bilingualism; social interaction; accommodation theory; Canadian French, Canadian English.) Much research has accrued recently which demonstrates that an individual's speech patterns are in part dependent on the person to whom he is talking, the topic of the discourse and the setting in which it takes place (reviewed by Giles & [1]

Backchannel Responses as Misleading Feedback in Intercultural Discourse

“…CAT states that interlocutors have a tendency to converge or diverge their linguistic codes in their conversations (Giles, Taylor, & Bourhis, 1973;Giles, Mulac, Bradac, & Johnson, 1987;Giles & Smith, 1979). Studies testing CAT in Chinese/Canadian conversations are scarce.…”

New challenges in psycholinguistics: Interactivity and alignment in interpersonal communication

“…Street 1984;garrod & anderson 1987;Bernieri & Rosenthal 1991), including the works of giles (e.g. giles et al 1973;giles & Smith 1979). the importance of the notion of alignment seems to lie in the fact that it helps immensely to understand, model or explain a number of phenomena on the linguistic, paralinguistic and extralinguistic levels of conversation, while its measures make it possible to predict communication flow and its success or failure (porzel et al 2006;Reitter & Moore 2007;Ramseyer & tschacher 2010).…”

It’s not just a brand name: The impact of language on consumer attitude and behavior

“…The SAT explains how speakers can communicate in different language, alter or accommodate their linguistic style to their audience, and obtain a positive or negative reaction (Giles et al, 1973).The Speech Accommodation Theory (SAT) is adapted to the impact of language use in brand names to Chinese consumers. Chinese consumers react towards the language use in brand name based on their language style.…”