Learning disabilities (LD) researchers have produced a knowledge base about the academic side of LD. A gap exists concerning the experiences of individuals with LD, particularly their feelingmeaning-making about having LDs. Based on a three-year qualitative study using critical ethnographic methods, I center Sophia Cruz's experiences with LD and the label. Sophia experienced the hegemony of smartness and disability micro-aggressions, and voiced the idea that LD is a complex multifaceted construct. I discuss implications for the LD field. [learning disabilities, affect, Latina/os, intersectionality, sociocultural, affective historical developmental perspectives]Learning disabilities (LD) researchers have produced a wealth of knowledge about the cognitive dimensions of LD, including educational and psychological interventions. Although there is a robust knowledge base on socioemotional aspects of LDs, there is a significant need to renew this work. A significant gap in the LD field is the lived experiences of individuals with LD, particularly in regard to their affective and emotional sense-making about having LDs that foregrounds culture and equity (Arzubiaga et al. 2008). Thus, I seek to examine the intersectional lives of Latina/o students with LD, their emotion-laden talk (cf. Edwards 1999; Moir 2005; Prior 2016) about being labeled with LD, and their understanding of the idea of LD.Research on the social and emotional dimensions of LD outlines a litany of deficits that these students suffer from, including but not limited to negative emotional and social conditions such as depression, anxiety, suicidal thoughts, and difficulty making friends leading to loneliness (Al-Yagon 2007;Bryan et al. 2004). Deficits in social and cognitive perception (Petti et al. 2002) and social competence (Hagger and Vaughn 1997) have also been documented. Hyperactivity, aggression, teasing, and bullying-as both the target and predator-can also be associated with the social and emotional profiles of students with LD (Forness and Kavale 1997).One key assumption in the LD field is that emotional and social impairments are exclusively located "in the individual." In contrast, I assume the distinctive traits of children and youth with LD are emotionally, socially, culturally, and historically bound and mediated. For this reason, it is critical that we document the perspectives and experiences of people with LDs at their intersections of social categories of difference. A handful of studies grounded in this perspective demonstrate that the lives of students with LD involve their creative navigation of multiple social and emotional worlds that include class, race, and gender and not only dis/ability (Connor, 2006(Connor, , 2008(Connor, , 2009Ferri and Connor 2010;Ferri and Gregg 1998). However, missing in this work is an interdisciplinary, focused, and robust theorizing of affect, emotionality, intersectionality, and the role of sociocultural historical developmental perspectives in the lives of students with LD. We need research that shed...