2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.telpol.2010.12.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Towards a new policy framework for spectrum management in India

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This suggests that emerging economy governments are recommended to adopt productive policies of developed economies related to not only takeovers but also industry-specific guidelines such as spectrum allocation, competition pricing, lock-in criteria for business consolidation, and technology development. A good policy supports industry development and its contribution to economic progress as well as social development (Sridhar and Prasad, 2011). Importantly, because M&A research reveals that acquisition strategy has failed to produce superior value to bidder shareholders around the public announcement and has an insignificant effect on post-merger financial performance (even for telecom deals, Majumdar et al , 2012; Park et al , 2002; Trillas, 2002; Wilcox et al , 2001), telecom multinationals are suggested to estimate target country’s business prospects and industry concentration to avoid higher-percentage of takeover premium and hedge other investment risks in countries with policy uncertainty risk and low-income status.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This suggests that emerging economy governments are recommended to adopt productive policies of developed economies related to not only takeovers but also industry-specific guidelines such as spectrum allocation, competition pricing, lock-in criteria for business consolidation, and technology development. A good policy supports industry development and its contribution to economic progress as well as social development (Sridhar and Prasad, 2011). Importantly, because M&A research reveals that acquisition strategy has failed to produce superior value to bidder shareholders around the public announcement and has an insignificant effect on post-merger financial performance (even for telecom deals, Majumdar et al , 2012; Park et al , 2002; Trillas, 2002; Wilcox et al , 2001), telecom multinationals are suggested to estimate target country’s business prospects and industry concentration to avoid higher-percentage of takeover premium and hedge other investment risks in countries with policy uncertainty risk and low-income status.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The spectrum usage charge increased with the amount of spectrum held. Additional spectrum was given based on the achievement of subscriber milestones (Sridhar & Prasad, 2011). Table 2 shows the subscriber linked spectrum usage charge in 2008.…”
Section: The Indian Telecommunications Marketmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to shortage of spectrum for commercial mobile services as indicated in the previous section, Indian government used a unique 'Subscriber Based Criterion' for assigning spectrum. This includes assignment of a start-up spectrum of 2.5-4.4 MHz and the release of additional spectrum contingent on the achievement of certain subscriber milestones as given in Sridhar and Prasad (2011). This piecemeal approach to spectrum assignment has also created non-contiguity of spectrum held by each operator as well.…”
Section: Assignment Of Spectrummentioning
confidence: 99%