2020
DOI: 10.17811/rifie.49.3.2020.199-216
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Towards a new conceptualization of Learning to Learn

Abstract: Aprender a aprender se destaca en investigación y políticas del nuevo milenio; ha ocupado la escena educativa en Europa, antes y después de la Recomendación del 2006 sobre Competencias clave. Sin embargo, aprender a aprender está etiquetado por algunos como concepto no científico, que requiere una definición acordada (Coffield, 2002). Lo que parece carecer es una comprensión de cómo funciona y cómo se puede reconocer en los individuos; de hecho, la mayoría de las investigaciones que mencionan este tema abordan… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
16
0
7

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
2
16
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…The six identified competencies, namely technology use, cognitive processing, digital reading, peer management, time management and will management should be taken into consideration to promote students' 21st century skills. In fact, the results of this study also coincide with the four domains of "learning to learn" proposed by Caena and Stringher [68], namely: cognitive and metacognitive domain, affective-motivational and learning dispositions domain, proactive domain and social domain.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…The six identified competencies, namely technology use, cognitive processing, digital reading, peer management, time management and will management should be taken into consideration to promote students' 21st century skills. In fact, the results of this study also coincide with the four domains of "learning to learn" proposed by Caena and Stringher [68], namely: cognitive and metacognitive domain, affective-motivational and learning dispositions domain, proactive domain and social domain.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…In terms of research, L2L is rooted within the cognitive and sociocultural research paradigms (Caena and Stringher 2020;Deakin Crick, Broadfoot, and Claxton 2004;Hautamäki et al 2002;Hoskins and Friedriksson 2008;Kupiainen, Hautamäki, and Rantanen 2008;Stringher 2014). In the literature, however, no established L2L definition exists, due to differing research traditions posing several theoretical hurdles (Deakin Crick et al 2014;Caena and Stringher 2020). A key difficulty for theorists is establishing boundaries and components for inclusion within this notion (Black et al 2006;Stringher 2008).…”
Section: L2l In the International Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another theoretical difficulty concerns the distinction between L2L components, determinants and outcomes (Stringher 2014). Following earlier work (Stringher 2008(Stringher , 2014, Caena and Stringher (2020) recently attempted to make these distinctions explicit. According to their definition, 'L2L is a complex hyper-competence orchestrating cognitive, metacognitive and socio-affective-motivational assets of the individual, in a voluntary effort to produce knowledge upon and improvement of one's own learning' (213).…”
Section: L2l In the International Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…120-140.) Se presentan las teorías que sustentan esta variable, la primera esta referida por John H.Flavell, que esta citada porFlavell (2019), en donde indica que la metacognicion implica la comprencion por paarte de las personas de los principios del pensamiento inteligente , ya sean propias o ajenas , tomandop la iniciativa frente a actitudes de otras personas .Una segunda teoria es la presentada por la Metacognición y aprendizaje: "aprender a aprender", que es citada porCaena & Stringher (2020) hace mención que la metacognicion es muy utilizada en los ambitos de la psicopedagocia y tambien en la docencia , siendo importante para los alumnos aprender a dicernir y a tener un pensamiento critico , con el analisis y entendimiento, siendo muy imprtante que las instituciones ducativas planteen estrategias para mejorara esta capoacidad en sus estudiantes.En presente estudio de investigación plantea el estudio de la variable de metacognición en sus dimensiones Percepción, Procesamiento de la información y Critico-reflexivo.…”
unclassified