Towards a human factors and ergonomics integration framework in the early product design phase: Function-Task-Behaviour

Sun, Xiaoguang; Houssin, Rémy; Renaud, Jean; Gardoni, Mickaël

doi:10.1080/00207543.2018.1437287

Cited by 18 publications

(18 citation statements)

References 26 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…This means applying only corrective ergonomic measures during the production phase, when the costs to solve problems are high and the production risks a stop for allowing possible interventions on the line (Dul & Neumann, 2009). This feeling has been recently confirmed by (Falk & Rosenquist, 2014) so that some authors tried to integrate the ergonomics during the design of workplaces (Caputo, Greco, Fera, & Macchiaroli, 2019;Sun et al, 2018).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Workplace design ergonomic validation based on multiple human factors assessment methods and simulation

Caputo

Greco

Fera

et al. 2019

Production & Manufacturing Research

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

According to the international literature postures, exerted forces, manual handling and repetitive actions with upper limbs must be considered in order to estimate the workers' exposure to biomechanical overload risk, but also a preventive ergonomic approach in the design phase is possible. Within the Industry 4.0, the digitalisation of manufacturing processes generate benefits in terms of production costs and time. Regarding the ergonomics, it is possible to set up a predictive model for the evaluation of biomechanical overload risk. This paper proposes an appraisal of a workplace design and ergonomics validation procedure based on simulation: data from assembly tasks simulation of Digital Human Models (DHM) can be used to assess the ergonomic indexes (OWAS, NIOSH, OCRA, EAWS, etc.). So, it is possible to preventively solve ergonomic risks during the design phase. A test case, regarding a real workplace of an assembly line of an important automotive Company, is also presented.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Workplace design ergonomic validation based on multiple human factors assessment methods and simulation

Caputo

Greco

Fera

et al. 2019

Production & Manufacturing Research

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Many studies mentioned in the literature attempt to integrate disciplines, concepts, and criteria during the design phase of the production machine to meet the needs of customers and users and to reduce modifications by adding additional procedures to the production process to increase the efficiency. Thus, we could mention the work relating to Design for X: where X can be a safety and ergonomics [2][3][4], cost [5], reliability [6,7], and user experience [8].…”

Section: Positioningmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…- Technical operations: Operations that can perform by the machines without the intervention of the user. And Socio-technical operations: Operations that can perform with the interaction between the user and the machine [35].…”

Section: Identification and Resolve Contradictions Due To The Conversion Of Internal Operation In External Operationmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Framework for resolving problems resulting from lean integration from the early design phases of production 3D printing machine

Slim¹,

Houssin²,

Coulibaly³

et al. 2021

FME Transactions

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

We focus on improving the performance of production machines (timesaving, flexibility, cost-effectiveness, safety) from the early design phase. Lean integration during the design phases might be a more appropriate solution, but this could be a source of some contradictions related to the machine performance and the usage requirements. In this paper, we propose an approach, based on Lean and Inventive Design Methodology (IDM-TRIZ), to identify and resolve these contradictions due to the Lean integration and also to provide innovative technical solutions. The approach is illustrated by the integration of the functionalities of the ''Single Minute of Exchange of Dies'' (SMED) and the ''5S'' method from the early design phase. A case study about the ''3D printer clogged nozzle'' outlines the feasibility of the proposed approach.

show abstract

“…Specifically, we describe how behavioural design combines the -often difficult to conceptualise -complexity of contextual, human behaviour in a social system (Fishbein and Ajzen 2010;Kahneman and Egan 2011) with that of a multi-component technical system (Weck, Roos, and Magee 2011). While these dimensions have been individually addressed to some degree in, for example, social design (Tromp, Hekkert, and Peter-Paul Verbeek 2011), within complex industrial product/machine design (Sun et al 2013;Sun et al 2018), and systems engineering (Haberfellner et al 2019) respectively, they have not previously been so closely connected in a single design approach. Furthermore, the interaction and evolution of these training and skills development between design and behavioural science 5.…”

Section: Understanding the Unique Characteristics Of Behaviour In Designmentioning

confidence: 99%

Understanding behavioural design: barriers and enablers

Khadilkar

Cash

2020

Journal of Engineering Design

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Behavioural design has emerged as an important domain of design research and practice. However, there is a need to better distinguish behavioural design and subsequently map its unique features and challenges. In answer to this need, this work examines the evolving role of behaviour in design and contrasts this with eleven in-depth behavioural design cases. This has resulted in our identification of behavioural design as a new paradigm of design, with a number of unique characteristics. Based on this, we propose a model of behavioural design. Furthermore, we identify three critical barriers to behavioural design in practice, and suggest ten mitigating enablers. Together these findings provide implications for further development of theory, practice, and education in behavioural design.

show abstract

Towards a human factors and ergonomics integration framework in the early product design phase: Function-Task-Behaviour

Cited by 18 publications

References 26 publications

Workplace design ergonomic validation based on multiple human factors assessment methods and simulation

Workplace design ergonomic validation based on multiple human factors assessment methods and simulation

Framework for resolving problems resulting from lean integration from the early design phases of production 3D printing machine

Understanding behavioural design: barriers and enablers

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About